2019
DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Angiogenesis and Glycolytic Imaging in Patients With Clinical Suspected Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Abstract: 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is an important diagnostic tool for accurate staging and assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC). However, 18F-FDG being non-specific marker, it also accumulates in inflammatory conditions, leading to false positive results. Angiogenesis, an essential characteristic for tumor development, intrusion and metastasis can be imaged using 68Ga-labeled RGD tripeptide. We here depict a series of clinically staged LABC pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinically, Durante et al showed in a limited study of 10 patients that [ 68 Ga]-NODAGA-RGD has a different spatial distribution than [ 18 F]-FDG bringing different tumour information [ 38 ]. Toriihara et al and Vatsa et al each later confirmed this concept in other small studies, comparing [ 18 F]-FDG with [ 18 F]-FPPRGD 2 [ 58 , 59 ]. Guo et al investigated but found no correlation between micro vessel density (a proliferation-related endothelial cell marker that reflects active angiogenesis) and [ 18 F]-FDG uptake using immunohistochemical staining measurements of angiogenesis in NSCLC [ 60 ].…”
Section: Indirect Targeting Of Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clinically, Durante et al showed in a limited study of 10 patients that [ 68 Ga]-NODAGA-RGD has a different spatial distribution than [ 18 F]-FDG bringing different tumour information [ 38 ]. Toriihara et al and Vatsa et al each later confirmed this concept in other small studies, comparing [ 18 F]-FDG with [ 18 F]-FPPRGD 2 [ 58 , 59 ]. Guo et al investigated but found no correlation between micro vessel density (a proliferation-related endothelial cell marker that reflects active angiogenesis) and [ 18 F]-FDG uptake using immunohistochemical staining measurements of angiogenesis in NSCLC [ 60 ].…”
Section: Indirect Targeting Of Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Although PSMA is not expressed in non-prostate tumours, nor in healthy vasculature, expression does occur in endothelial cells of tumour-associated neovasculature [ 86 ]. Two excellent reviews of PSMA-based imaging in non-prostate imaging have been recently published [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 ], but we would like to briefly present the findings regarding angiogenesis here. The functional role of PSMA in angiogenesis is not clear at this moment, nor is PSMA a requirement for tumour-associated neovascularisation—but PSMA expression is associated to tumours that critically depend on angiogenesis.…”
Section: Indirect Targeting Of Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 F-AH111585 tracer uptake either homogeneously distributed in tumors or appearing within the tumor rim in metastatic breast cancer patients, which was consistent with the general principles of angiogenesis localization within the outer zones of breast tumors, where viable tumors exist (129)(130)(131)(132). Vatsa et al reported the results of 68 Ga-DOTA-RGD2 PET/CT in patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC) and found both 68 Ga-DOTA-RGD2 and 18 F-FDG were similarly able to diagnose primary and metastatic lymph nodes, and RGD-based imaging showed additional value for distinguishing nonspecific 18 F-FDG uptake due to an infectious or inflammatory etiology (133). The sensitivity and specificity of 18 F-FPPRGD2 PET for identifying either breast lesions or metastatic lesions were higher than those for 18 F-FDG PET/CT (95.7% vs. 87.0%, and 100% vs. 57.1%) (63).…”
Section: Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in HER2 (-) and ER(+) breast cancer lesions, 18 F-Alfatide II uptake was higher than 18 F-FDG uptake (88). It is worthy noting that RGD PET may neglect the distant metastasis in liver; for example, Kumar et al found that 68 Ga-DOTA-RGD was not retained in liver metastases in 9 patients (16%) that were discovered with 18 F-FDG imaging (119,133). The high background activity of liver regions may contribute to this phenomenon (60).…”
Section: Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%