2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2481(04)00110-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of cationic and anionic intercalators for the electrochemical transduction of DNA hybridization via long range electron transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively small currents observed in Experiments 3 and 4 compared with Experiment 1 implied that the non-specific adsorption of AQMS was negligible. The slight adsorption of AQMS onto DNA probe (ssDNA) was consistent with observation previously reported [ 41 ]. The highest current observed for the complementary DNA (Experiment 1) thus indicated hybrization where intercalation of AQMS had occurred in dsDNA formed on the microsphere surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relatively small currents observed in Experiments 3 and 4 compared with Experiment 1 implied that the non-specific adsorption of AQMS was negligible. The slight adsorption of AQMS onto DNA probe (ssDNA) was consistent with observation previously reported [ 41 ]. The highest current observed for the complementary DNA (Experiment 1) thus indicated hybrization where intercalation of AQMS had occurred in dsDNA formed on the microsphere surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The optimum microbiosensor response ( Figure 9 ) is dependent on the temperature and reached at a shorter time span for higher hybridization temperatures. The length of DNA hybridization time obtained herein is similar to that reported elsewhere [ 41 ]. Even at room temperature of 25 °C, the current response of the microbiosensor is large enough for further biosensor studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Significant attention has also focused on improving the detection methods for DNA hybridization (Palecek, 2002). The hybridization event has been detected via electroactive or redox indicators such as metal coordination complexes or intercalating organic compounds (Peng et al, 2002;Wong et al, 2004;Meric et al, 2002;Ju et al, 2003;Babkina et al, 2004). Besides electrochemical detection, SPR has gained significant popularity in DNA sensing and other bioapplications.…”
Section: Biorecognition Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, gold nanoparticles and 5' end -SH modified DNA (HS-DNA) as nucleotide probes were self-assembled onto the surface of Au electrode respectively. DNA hybridization was assessed with the changes in the voltammetric peak of an indicator of anthraquinone-2, 6-disulfonic acid (AQDS) [10] .This DNA immobilization strategy demonstrates that the DNA immobilized on self-assembled MWCNTs yields a higher response current than that without MWCNTs. The protocol for DNA probe immobilization and hybridization of probe with target were illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%