A Comparison of Conductivity And West-Gaeke Analyses For Sulfur Dioxide

Booras, Samuel G.; Zimmer, Charles E.

doi:10.1080/00022470.1968.10469177

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Biases of this magnitude when measuring ambient air in the eastern U.S., Kawasaki, Japan, and California are reported in the literature (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Usually, but not always, the conductimetric measurements exceed the pararosaniline measurements.…”

Section: -Hour Average So2 Data Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Conductimetric and pararosaniline method sulfur dioxide monitoring uncertainties and their significance

Fein¹,

Bailey²

1978

Environ. Sci. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conductimetric and pararosaniline method 24-h average SO2 determinations from routine monitoring in southern California are analyzed to estimate method uncertainties. Random measurement errors range to 0.02 and 0.006 ppm for the two methods, respectively. Total conductimetric method uncertainties range to 0.06 ppm. Hence, this method is not satisfactory for determining compliance with very low ambient air quality standards.

show abstract

Section: -Hour Average So2 Data Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Conductimetric and pararosaniline method sulfur dioxide monitoring uncertainties and their significance

Fein¹,

Bailey²

1978

Environ. Sci. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The conductimetric methods, which were preferred for continuous monitoring, were improved (63,295). Titration was one of the earliest methods used to assess presence of S02 and S03.…”

Section: Gasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Air pollution

Mueller¹,

Kothny²,

Pierce³

et al. 1971

Anal. Chem.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

paper was prepared to provide an overview of analytical activities concerning air pollution in the years of 1969 and 1970. It avoids overlapping the previous analogous review [Altshuller, A. P., Anal. Chem., 41, 1R, (1969)]. As a practical matter, most of the papers included were dated in the period June 1968 to August 1970. In most cases we had to rely on abstracts. Papers readily available to us but published after August 1970 were also included.A review such as this, is intended primarily to collate and to provide perspective on what has been published. We have found previous reviews useful not only at the time of publication but also years afterward. A review largely restricted to the information published cannot be relied upon to include the more recent advances in a rapidly progressing field.

show abstract

Electrochemical Methods of Pollution Analysis

Epstein

1972

Electrochemistry of Cleaner Environments

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Comparison of Conductivity And West-Gaeke Analyses For Sulfur Dioxide

Cited by 6 publications

References 2 publications

Conductimetric and pararosaniline method sulfur dioxide monitoring uncertainties and their significance

Conductimetric and pararosaniline method sulfur dioxide monitoring uncertainties and their significance

Air pollution

Electrochemical Methods of Pollution Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About