2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Conventional and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Schedules In the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified 606 records, of which 13 reports of 12 comparative trials (6 randomized-controlled trials [3,10,11,[19][20][21][22][23], 3 cohort studies [22,[24][25][26], and 3 retrospective case-control studies [22,27,28]) with a total of 4,572 participants (see Fig. S1).…”
Section: Literature Research and Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified 606 records, of which 13 reports of 12 comparative trials (6 randomized-controlled trials [3,10,11,[19][20][21][22][23], 3 cohort studies [22,[24][25][26], and 3 retrospective case-control studies [22,27,28]) with a total of 4,572 participants (see Fig. S1).…”
Section: Literature Research and Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have determined a general biochemical control rate of 83% at 5 years. Our patients, with one year follow up, are low PSA levels, none has achieved an increase that meets the established class definition for biochemical failure in Phoenix; to date our control is 100%, considering it is a study program at a single institution hypofractionation reporting preliminary results [13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%