A Comparison of Elevation, Perforation Rate, and Time Spent for the Crestal Sinus Elevation Intervened by Piezosurgery, CAS-Kit, and Osteotome in a Novel Goat Model

Wu, Huayue; Wang, Jue; Wang, Chengyu; Yang, Xin; Gong, Qiannan; Su, Weiji; Cheng, Aoran; Fan, Yawei

doi:10.1007/s12663-022-01793-4

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some techniques used the transcrestal approach to increase the bone height in such cases (osteotomes, balloon, piezosurgery, etc.) 8 , 9 . These techniques were more favorable because they were simpler and caused fewer complications than the lateral approach technique 10 .…”

Section: Clinical Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate dental implantation after indirect sinus elevation using osseodensification concept: a case report

Mohrez,

Amam,

Alnour

et al. 2023

Annals of Medicine &Amp; Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction and importance: Implantation in the posterior maxilla is more challenging due to the insufficient bone height after maxillary sinus pneumatization and the low bone density. Osseodensification (OD) is considered a novel, less invasive, and more effective indirect sinus floor elevation technique. Case presentation: A 52-year-old male presented to the oral and maxillofacial surgery department with a main complaint of chewing difficulties in the right posterior area maxilla (teeth numbers: 26 and 27). A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging showed that the residual bone height ranged between 1 and 4 mm and the width ranged between 9 and 12 mm in the area of teeth numbers 16 and 17. Intervention and outcome: The treatment plan was to extract the teeth (numbers: 16 and 17) and conduct internal sinus lifting and bone grafting using the OD burs with immediate implantation. Clinical discussion: OD is proposed as an alternative procedure to the direct (lateral window) sinus floor elevation procedure. The amount of vertical bone gain obtained by this technique in transcrestal sinus lifting can be the same as external sinus lifting in this case. Conclusion: OD can be considered a promising technique for direct sinus floor elevation, considering the amount of vertical bone gain obtained by this technique.

show abstract

Section: Clinical Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate dental implantation after indirect sinus elevation using osseodensification concept: a case report

Mohrez,

Amam,

Alnour

et al. 2023

Annals of Medicine &Amp; Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To reduce trauma and risk of membrane perforation, which is the most common intraoperative complication associated with maxillary sinus lift surgery [7,8], several techniques for the transcrestal approach have been discussed [9,10], including balloon elevation technique [11], hydraulic sinus condensing technique [12], trephine assisted lifting, MISE technique, and CAS KIT (NeoBiotech, quokkaMED O.E. Athens, Greece) [13]. Other advantages of the transcrestal approach are the possibility of combining the sinus elevation and regeneration, with biomaterials or without biomaterials, with the simultaneous insertion of the implants in one surgical step [9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiographic Study of Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Using Osseodensification Technique with Graft Material: A Pilot Study

Sulyhan-Sulyhan,

Barberá-Millán,

Larrazábal-Morón

et al. 2024

Biomimetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the level of implant success after transcrestal sinus floor elevation (tSFE) using the osseodensification technique (OD) combined with beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) by analyzing clinical and radiographic results. Moreover, the increase in bone height was analyzed immediately after surgery, 3 months after, and before loading by taking standardized radiographic measurements. Thirteen patients, four males and nine females, with a mean age of 54.69 ± 5.86 years, requiring the placement of one implant in the upper posterior maxilla, with a residual bone height of <8 mm and a minimum bone width of 5 mm, participated in the study. The bone gain data was obtained using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) immediately after surgery and twelve months after the placement. The correlation between initial and final bone height with implant stability was also assessed. The results were analyzed using SPSS 23 software (p < 0.05). The results of the study indicated a 100% implant success rate after a follow-up period of twelve months. Preoperative main bone height was 5.70 ± 0.95 mm. The osseodensification technique allowed a significant increase of 6.65 ± 1.06 mm immediately after surgery. After a twelve-month follow-up, a graft material contraction of 0.90 ± 0.49 mm was observed. No correlation was observed between the bone height at the different times of the study and the primary stability of the implant. Considering the limitations of the size sample of this study, the osseodensification technique used for transcrestal sinus lift with the additional bone graft material (β-TCP) may provide a predictable elevation of the maxillary sinus floor, allowing simultaneous implant insertion with adequate stability irrespective of bone height limitations.

show abstract

“…[6][7][8][9][10] Common CSFE includes utilizing osteotomes, piezosurgical units, SCA kits, CAS kits, DASK system, and novel osseous densification kits named Densah burs. 1,3,8,[11][12][13][14] CSFE via Densah burs was first proposed by Huwais et al in 2018. 11 These specific burs compact autogenous grafting during the osteotomy in a counterclockwise motion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Graftless Sinus Augmentation via Crestal Sinus Floor Elevation using Densah Burs with Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Clinical Report after Two Years in Service

Hung¹,

Liu²

2023

SVOADE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maxillary sinus floor elevation is a reliable surgical procedure to establish oral rehabilitation using implant prostheses in the atrophic maxilla. Both lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) and crestal sinus floor elevation (CSFE) are viable to augment inadequate alveolar bone height. Still, the results of post-surgical trauma, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) vary. Furthermore, combining bone grafting for maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) is suggested to increase the volume of the alveolar ridge, yet more researches have demonstrated outcomes of the graftless method. This clinical report describes a graftless sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement utilizing Densah burs implementing CSFE through the osseodensification method.

show abstract

A Comparison of Elevation, Perforation Rate, and Time Spent for the Crestal Sinus Elevation Intervened by Piezosurgery, CAS-Kit, and Osteotome in a Novel Goat Model

Cited by 4 publications

References 21 publications

Immediate dental implantation after indirect sinus elevation using osseodensification concept: a case report

Immediate dental implantation after indirect sinus elevation using osseodensification concept: a case report

Radiographic Study of Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Using Osseodensification Technique with Graft Material: A Pilot Study

Graftless Sinus Augmentation via Crestal Sinus Floor Elevation using Densah Burs with Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Clinical Report after Two Years in Service

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About