2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38221-5_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Graph Embedding Methods for Pattern Recognition

Abstract: Abstract. In recent years graph embedding has emerged as a promising solution for enabling the expressive, convenient, powerful but computational expensive graph based representations to benefit from mature, less expensive and efficient state of the art machine learning models of statistical pattern recognition. In this paper we present a comparison of two implicit and three explicit state of the art graph embedding methodologies. Our preliminary experimentation on different chemoinformatics datasets illustrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After showing the possible extension of the vocabulary, it is interesting to use graph embedding techniques (bridging the gap between structural and statistical symbol recognition) and graph kernels, which are basically targeted to reduce the time complexity (Conte et al, 2013;Foggia & Vento, 2010;Luqman, 2012;Riesen & Bunke, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After showing the possible extension of the vocabulary, it is interesting to use graph embedding techniques (bridging the gap between structural and statistical symbol recognition) and graph kernels, which are basically targeted to reduce the time complexity (Conte et al, 2013;Foggia & Vento, 2010;Luqman, 2012;Riesen & Bunke, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just to get an idea of the efficiency of these methods, we present in Table 1 an extract of the results of both methods, presented in Ref. 4, on known graph bases for classification.…”
Section: Graph Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However k GA not only generalizes the dynamic time warping kernel k DTW , but also provides richer statistic measures by incorporating the whole spectrum of alignment costs {D P,Q (π),π ∈A(m, n)}. Intuitively, the global alignment kernel k GA allows one to define a new graph kernel, by measuring the warping alignment π between any types of graph characteristic sequences that have certain element orders with increasing structural variables, e.g, the graph embedding vectors proposed by Conte et al (2013), the depth-based complexity traces from expansion subgraphs of increasing sizes proposed by Bai and Hancock (2016) , or cycle characteristics with increasing lengths identified from the Ihara zeta function proposed by Ren et al (2011).…”
Section: Global Alignment Kernels From the Dynamic Time Warping Framementioning
confidence: 99%