2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of four different microleakage tests for assessment of leakage of root canal fillings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, results vary depending on the method employed, creating serious concerns for reproducibility, and suggesting that a more critical analysis of the available models is needed. 7,8,11,16 Among the methods currently employed to determine leakage, the one described by Xu et al 13 has been preferred, because it uses glucose as a tracer, and allows continuous observer-independent measurements of a high number of specimens. However, the system (UV-VIS) detection efficiency was not adequate for making microleakage measurements, and some interfaces of the apparatus were sealed with cyanoacrylate, a material that has been widely criticized for failing to prevent leakage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, results vary depending on the method employed, creating serious concerns for reproducibility, and suggesting that a more critical analysis of the available models is needed. 7,8,11,16 Among the methods currently employed to determine leakage, the one described by Xu et al 13 has been preferred, because it uses glucose as a tracer, and allows continuous observer-independent measurements of a high number of specimens. However, the system (UV-VIS) detection efficiency was not adequate for making microleakage measurements, and some interfaces of the apparatus were sealed with cyanoacrylate, a material that has been widely criticized for failing to prevent leakage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 When new sealing materials or techniques emerge, studies should be performed to warrant their clinical application and to accurately assess their characteristics and properties, particularly their sealing ability. Several methods aimed at detecting leakage have already been described in the literature, such as the conductometric technique, 2 fluid filtration, 3,4 radioisotopes, 5 bacterial penetration, 6 the electrochemical test, 7 and the use of dyes. 8,9 However, all these methods have yielded controversial results, and have therefore been widely criticized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Karagenç et al,14 the difference in results obtained when using various methods to assess leakage may be attributed to the differences in the working principles of various tests methods and the different nature of obturation materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although thermoplastic techniques show a certain superiority in achieving gutta-percha density, compared to cold techniques, 5 neither technique can effectively prevent the leakage, which has been analyzed by several different methods. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Considering that different filling techniques and sealers have resulted in similar apical seals, [20][21][22] it seems wise to investigate other reasons associated with greater or lesser leakage rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%