Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9725-8_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Grid-based and Continuous Space Pedestrian Modelling Software: Analysis of Two UK Train Stations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, we do not discuss here the changing of the travel time between the waiting boxes and the platform (which, however, increased with the growth of the number of pilgrims in the simulated scenario), but rather different metrics of space utilization. In particular, the first metric is called cumulative mean density (CMD) as discussed by Castle, Waterson, Pellissier, and Bail (2011), a measure associated to a given position of the environment indicating the average density perceived by pedestrians that passed through that point. It is quite straightforward to compute this value in a discrete approach like the one described in this work.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we do not discuss here the changing of the travel time between the waiting boxes and the platform (which, however, increased with the growth of the number of pilgrims in the simulated scenario), but rather different metrics of space utilization. In particular, the first metric is called cumulative mean density (CMD) as discussed by Castle, Waterson, Pellissier, and Bail (2011), a measure associated to a given position of the environment indicating the average density perceived by pedestrians that passed through that point. It is quite straightforward to compute this value in a discrete approach like the one described in this work.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, some authors (Castle et al, 2011) have compared the use of STEPS (a Cellular Automata model) with LEGION. The authors conclude that both models get good results, however LEGION is more realistic than STEPS because it is based on a continuous movement algorithm rather than grids.…”
Section: Second Stage: Modeling and Mock-up Adjustmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Castle et al 2011), CMD evaluation in LEGION b and STEPS c software is analysed and compared: in LEGION, the surrounding of a pedestrian is identified into a radius r = 1.5 m with an area d of Area = r 2 * π = 7.07m 2 . STEPS adopts a similar approach calculating the density in a discrete way using the cells that fall within r = 1.25 m of each persons: the area considered is Area = r 2 = 6.25m 2 .…”
Section: Density Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we adopted a metric is called cumulative mean density (CMD) (Castle et al 2011), a measure associated to a given position of the environment indicating the average density perceived by pedestrians that passed through that point. It is quite straightforward to compute this value in a discrete approach like the one http://www.casmodeling.com/content/1/1/7 Figure 11 Comparison among the level of dispersions for group of six members in corridor A, B and C. described in this work.…”
Section: T-junction Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%