2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of initial stiffness formulations for small-strain soil–pile dynamic Winkler modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…x 1 and x 2 are the first and second circular frequencies of the system (rad s -1 ) and n 1 ¼ n 2 ¼ n is the damping ratio adopted. All simulations in this paper are undertaken with a damping ratio of 2% to simulate energy dissipation from the system, which is broadly in keeping with the expected value for lightly damped structures and is broadly in line with the results obtained from pile tests presented in [26].…”
Section: Bridge Structural Modellingsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…x 1 and x 2 are the first and second circular frequencies of the system (rad s -1 ) and n 1 ¼ n 2 ¼ n is the damping ratio adopted. All simulations in this paper are undertaken with a damping ratio of 2% to simulate energy dissipation from the system, which is broadly in keeping with the expected value for lightly damped structures and is broadly in line with the results obtained from pile tests presented in [26].…”
Section: Bridge Structural Modellingsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…2. The soil surrounding the foundation piles is modelled using a system of discrete, mutually independent, closely spaced spring elements, known as Winkler springs [13,[24][25][26]. Each spring has 2-DOFs and permits 1-D movement only along the spring axis.…”
Section: Bridge Structural Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and is arguably the most challenging aspect (Prendergast and Gavin, 2016;Wu et al, 2018). Traditional 92 approaches for predicting SRD such as Stevens et al (1982), Toolan and Fox (1977), and Semple and 93 Gemeinhardt (1981) are largely empirical and therefore, extrapolation to pile geometries and soil 94 conditions outside of the dataset on which they are based is highly questionable.…”
Section: Introduction 71mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prendergast and Gavin [11] treated a buried pipeline as a short beam on an elastic foundation and analyzed its additional stress distribution.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%