2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0039554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of magnetoconductivities between type-I and type-II Weyl semimetals

Abstract: It is well known that Weyl semimetals (WSMs) are classified into two types of type-I and type-II depending on whether or not they have electron and hole pockets. Also, these WSMs have peculiar transport properties such as negative longitudinal magnetoresistance and planar Hall effect because of a chiral anomaly. In this paper, however, we show that the chiral anomaly can cause positive longitudinal magnetoresistance in type-II WSMs. Here, we investigate longitudinal and transverse magnetoconductivities of time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,29,30 In addition, recently we have revealed that type-II WSMs show not only the negative but also the positive longitudinal magnetoresistance originating from the chiral anomaly in our paper of Journal of Applied Physics. 31 The negative longitudinal magnetoresistance in type-I WSMs can be explained by the conventional formula of the chiral anomaly developed by Nielsen and Ninomiya, 32 which does not include the term related to the inclination of the Weyl cones. However, the positive and the negative longitudinal magnetoresistance in type-II WSMs cannot be explained by it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,29,30 In addition, recently we have revealed that type-II WSMs show not only the negative but also the positive longitudinal magnetoresistance originating from the chiral anomaly in our paper of Journal of Applied Physics. 31 The negative longitudinal magnetoresistance in type-I WSMs can be explained by the conventional formula of the chiral anomaly developed by Nielsen and Ninomiya, 32 which does not include the term related to the inclination of the Weyl cones. However, the positive and the negative longitudinal magnetoresistance in type-II WSMs cannot be explained by it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%