1974
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(74)90040-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of methods for labelling DNA for use in the radioimmuno assay of DNA-antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that traces of denatured DNA (0.1% of the total) may react in complement fixation. In chemically labeled IZ6I-DNA, the presence of protein traces, exposure to oxidizing agents, and high specific radioactivity resulting in damage to DNA may distort the results (17)(18)(19). In contrast, labeling the DNA by biologic incorporation of Y-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) reduces or eliminates these difficulties and simultaneously provides the sensitivity and convenience of gamma isotope counting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that traces of denatured DNA (0.1% of the total) may react in complement fixation. In chemically labeled IZ6I-DNA, the presence of protein traces, exposure to oxidizing agents, and high specific radioactivity resulting in damage to DNA may distort the results (17)(18)(19). In contrast, labeling the DNA by biologic incorporation of Y-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) reduces or eliminates these difficulties and simultaneously provides the sensitivity and convenience of gamma isotope counting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%