2012
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of several methods of macular hole measurement using optical coherence tomography, and their value in predicting anatomical and visual outcomes

Abstract: Base diameter, macular hole inner opening and minimum linear diameter can each be used to predict anatomical and/or functional success in macular hole surgery. Preoperative base diameter is the most useful variable in this regard, as it holds the strongest association with anatomical and visual outcome and is easily measured on a OCT scan.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
127
2
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
127
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Base diameter, macular hole inner opening and minimum linear diameter has been found to be predictor of anatomical and functional success in macular hole surgery; base diameter holding the strongest association. 18,19 However, both macular hole closure and visual improvement showed no correlation with minimum linear diameter, base diameter and hole height in our study. This may be due to the fact that only stage 3 MH were included in our study and thus hole size larger than 400 µm did not show correlation with anatomical and functional success.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Base diameter, macular hole inner opening and minimum linear diameter has been found to be predictor of anatomical and functional success in macular hole surgery; base diameter holding the strongest association. 18,19 However, both macular hole closure and visual improvement showed no correlation with minimum linear diameter, base diameter and hole height in our study. This may be due to the fact that only stage 3 MH were included in our study and thus hole size larger than 400 µm did not show correlation with anatomical and functional success.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…7 Further evidence for an adverse effect on retinal adhesion is that all eight of the BEAVRS cases with a retinal tear went on to develop a retinal detachment, whereas natural history studies of spontaneous posterior vitreous detachment suggest that only 30-50% of tears progress to retinal detachment. [10][11][12] The 46.9% incidence of widening of the FTMH basal diameter in failed ocriplasmin cases could have implications for visual outcomes, as increased basal diameter has previously been found to predict worse post-operative vision; 13 however, this was not found in the MIVI TRUST trials where the acuity improvement in failed ocriplasmin eyes was the same as in placebo treated eyes. 14,15 There is uncertainty as to the cause of the observed widened basal diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Table 1 shows the representative OCT parameters repeatedly discussed in previous papers in terms of their potential as preoperative predictors for postoperative visual outcomes. The minimum diameter of MH, also known as the minimum linear dimension of MH, is identical to the above-mentioned MH size, one of the most studied OCT parameters so far [52,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. Commonly, a smaller minimum diameter is associated with better postoperative visual acuity, irrespective of the presence/absence of a statistical significance.…”
Section: Preoperative Predictive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 91%