1983
DOI: 10.1016/0377-0427(83)90014-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of some ODE solvers which require Jacobian evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, implicit solvers are computationally more expensive as they generate a Jacobian matrix and solve a set of algebraic equations at every time step using a Newton-like method. To reduce such extra cost, the implicit solver offers a Solver Jacobian method that allows improving the simulation performance of the implicit solvers [44]. Stiff differential equations are numerically unstable unless the step size is extremely small.…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, implicit solvers are computationally more expensive as they generate a Jacobian matrix and solve a set of algebraic equations at every time step using a Newton-like method. To reduce such extra cost, the implicit solver offers a Solver Jacobian method that allows improving the simulation performance of the implicit solvers [44]. Stiff differential equations are numerically unstable unless the step size is extremely small.…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we seek a method of the form (2.2) such that P2,, and f12,, are unchanged from the minimum configuration (4,2,4) process, then the consistency equations for a (3, 2,4) 3(4,2,4) process of the form (1.2) which is the Lstable.…”
Section: The 3(424) Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods were tested with some equations taken from reference [4]. The equations used were: The calculated solution was required to satisfy an absolute error tolerance of lo-^?…”
Section: Numerical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%