A comparison of structure from motion photogrammetry and the traversing micro-erosion meter for measuring erosion on shore platforms

Abstract

Abstract. For decades researchers have used the micro-erosion meter and its successor the traversing micro-erosion meter to measure micro-scale rates of vertical erosion (downwearing) on shore platforms. Difficulties with “upscaling” of micro-scale field data in order to explain long-term platform evolution have led to calls to introduce other methods which allow for the measurement of platform erosion at different scales. Structure from motion photogrammetry is fast emerging as a reliable, cost-effective tool for geomorphic change detection, providing a valuable means for detecting micro-scale to mesoscale geomorphic change over different terrain types. Here we present the results of an experiment in which we test the efficacy of structure from motion photogrammetry for measuring change on shore platforms due to different erosion processes (sweeping abrasion, scratching, and percussion). Key to this approach is the development of the coordinate reference system used to reference and scale the models, which can be easily deployed in the field. Experiments were carried out on three simulated platform surfaces with low to high relative rugosity to assess the influence of surface roughness. We find that structure from motion photogrammetry can be used to reliably detect micro-scale (sub-millimetre) and mesoscale (cm) erosion on shore platforms with a low rugosity index. As topographic complexity increases, the scale of detection is reduced. We also provide a detailed comparison of the two methods across a range of categories including cost, data collection, analysis, and output. We find that structure from motion offers several advantages over the micro-erosion meter, most notably the ability to detect and measure the erosion of shore platforms at different scales.

Introducing PebbleCounts: A grain-sizing tool for photo surveys of dynamic gravel-bed rivers

“…On the other hand, in the perfect lab setting with 16 photos from ∼1.5 m, the detrended flat carpet around the pebbles achieved a standard deviation of 0.2 mm (33,371 points), similar to other SfM-MVS studies using large numbers of carefully collected images (e.g., Cullen et al, 2018;Verma and Bourke, 2019). These standard deviations from detrended flat surfaces represent a best-case scenario, whereas, in our field setting, the vertical uncertainty on the complex, overlapping pebbles is likely higher.…”

A method based on structure-from-motion photogrammetry to generate sub-millimetre-resolution digital elevation models for investigating rock breakdown features

“…Norwick and Dexter, 2002;Bruthans et al, 2018). There are a number of areal surface roughness and geomorphometric parameters that can be applied to quantify rock breakdown (Leach, 2013;Lai et al, 2014;Davis et al, 2015;Du Preez, 2015;Trevisani and Rocca, 2015;Verma and Bourke, 2017). The ability to quantify surface change across an area rather than limited to specific points will aid interpretation of the causal links between controls and resultant landform development.…”

A critical assessment of the potential for Structure‐from‐Motion photogrammetry to produce high fidelity 3D dental models

“…This slightly improved the accuracy of wear facet identification and measurement, however, high levels of surface noise meant that the deviation of these measurements from those derived from the SLS reference models was still beyond the limits of acceptability for the performance of OFA. Similarly, although studies of 3D topographic changes in the geosciences have reported the capacity of SfM approaches to detect changes in the profile of surfaces at a submillimetre level, the detection of scratches and features smaller than 0.3 mm was inconsistent and fell outside the limits of detection of the method used in a recent study (Cullen, Verma, & Bourke, 2018).…”