1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00897-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
214
0
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
214
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We make use of the methodology employed in Beaudry and Swann (2001), Baptista and Swann (1998) and Swann and Prevezer (1996). In contrast to these studies, we do not use the employment within the own industry in a given political unit as a "global" measure of cluster strength.…”
Section: Life Time Growth Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We make use of the methodology employed in Beaudry and Swann (2001), Baptista and Swann (1998) and Swann and Prevezer (1996). In contrast to these studies, we do not use the employment within the own industry in a given political unit as a "global" measure of cluster strength.…”
Section: Life Time Growth Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have specifically designed a survey to collect data on firms' performance (number of innovations and employment) as well as a set of observable indicators for the various forces which may be operating in clusters. Second, we do not regard the spatial scope of clusters as identical 1 The same approach has been used by Beaudry and Swann (2001) Baptista and Swann (1998) and Swann and Prevezer (1996). 4 to the boundaries of political regions as done by previous empirical research (Beaudry (2001); Beaudry and Swann (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only can activities of such R&D research centers strengthen the research and innovative capacities of the firms already present in the clusters, they may also attract the entry of new firms that carry out their own research, development and innovation. Swann and Prevezer (1996) argue that new firms in biotechnology are strongly attracted to the presence of a strong science base at the location and Prevezer (1997) adds that new companies are also attracted by the entry of other new companies. Baptista and Swann (1999) find that by entry of new firms the cluster attracts even more other firms and that this cluster self-reinforcing effect could start out of the emergence of one strong firm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andersson T., Schwaag-Serger S., Sorvik J., and Wise Hansson E. define clustering as a process of the enterprises and other entities joint disposition within a concentrated geographical area, cooperation of a certain functional niche and within work alliances for enhancing these entities collective competitiveness (Andersson, Schwaag-Serger, Sorvik, & Wise Hansson, 2004). Other researchers (Swann & Prevezer, 1996;Bergman & Feser, 1999;Visser & Bosсhma, 2002;Vázquez-Barquero, 2006;Potter & Miranda, 2009;Villa & Antonelli, 2009;Monteiro, Noronha, & Neto, 2011;Wise & Johansson, 2012) adhere to this view.…”
Section: Objectives and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%