2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the effectiveness of QuEChERS, FaPEx and a modified QuEChERS method on the determination of organochlorine pesticides in ginseng

Abstract: This study provides a review of methods used in the determination of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in ginseng and compares the effectiveness of three extraction methods (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS), a modified QuEChERS and a Fast Pesticide Extraction (FaPEx)) in the analyses of 20 OCPs in ginseng root samples. For each method, sample mass, solvent volume and sorbent mass were varied to identify the optimum combination to effectively isolate analytes of interest from the comple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ideal conditions, the total absence of ME is recognized when the two curves are overlapping. 47 , 48 The comparison of the two slopes in solvent and diluted CF, shown in Figure 6 , indicates the total absence of ME, allowing an accurate quantification in this complex matrix. To emphasize this result, MRM profiles of the two-compound mixture at 0.5 ng/mL in 70:30 water/MeOH (v/v) with PA 0.2% and diluted CF at the same concentration were compared, as shown in Figure S-2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ideal conditions, the total absence of ME is recognized when the two curves are overlapping. 47 , 48 The comparison of the two slopes in solvent and diluted CF, shown in Figure 6 , indicates the total absence of ME, allowing an accurate quantification in this complex matrix. To emphasize this result, MRM profiles of the two-compound mixture at 0.5 ng/mL in 70:30 water/MeOH (v/v) with PA 0.2% and diluted CF at the same concentration were compared, as shown in Figure S-2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the QuEChERS method was applied to extract and purify the fruit samples. 26 Briefly, 10 g of the homogenized sample was extracted with 10 mL of acetonitrile. Then, MgSO 4 (6 g) and NaCl (1.5 g) were added to a centrifuge tube and the cap was tightened immediately.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the QuEChERS method was applied to extract and purify the fruit samples . Briefly, 10 g of the homogenized sample was extracted with 10 mL of acetonitrile.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of endosulfan residues in soil and ginseng was followed the previously reported method by Bruce-Vanderpuije et al (2021). For the soil sample, 5.0 g sample was added 2.0 g MgSO4, 0.5 g NaCl, and 0.5 g trisodium citrate and extracted with 10 mL acetonitrile by shaking at 180 rpm for two hours with sonication for 15 min.…”
Section: Endosulfan Residue Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stockholm Convention has classified endosulfan as a persistent organic pollutant (POPs) due to its persistence, long-range transport, and high bioaccumulation properties Choi et al, 2021;Sathishkumar et al, 2021). Most countries have banned the production and use of endosulfan a decade ago, however, it is still frequently detected in the air, water, and soil environment (Oh et al, 2020;Bruce-Vanderpuije et al, 2021). The reported 50% dissipation time (DT50) in soil is 4 to 75 days, 4 to 376 days, 26 to 200 days, and 6 to >200 days for α-endosulfan, β-endosulfan, endosulfan sulfate, and total endosulfan, respectively (Ntow et al, 2007;Weber et al, 2010;Vaikosen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%