1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-3791(98)00098-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the lichenometric and Schmidt hammer dating techniques based on data from the proglacial areas of some Icelandic glaciers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
209
1
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
209
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Small areas of the fluted forelands, especially on the Blá-gilsjökull foreland, are characterized by discontinuous arcuate chains of low amplitude ridges (Figure 8), which are interpreted as overridden moraines (sensu Evans, Archer, & Wilson, 1999, 2009, 2015aEvans & Orton, 2014;Evans & Twigg, 2002;Krüger, 1994).…”
Section: Overridden Morainesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small areas of the fluted forelands, especially on the Blá-gilsjökull foreland, are characterized by discontinuous arcuate chains of low amplitude ridges (Figure 8), which are interpreted as overridden moraines (sensu Evans, Archer, & Wilson, 1999, 2009, 2015aEvans & Orton, 2014;Evans & Twigg, 2002;Krüger, 1994).…”
Section: Overridden Morainesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moraines of Skálafellsjökull were in contact with the moraines of Heinabergsjökull and Fláajökull (Text- fig. 1) and the three glaciers created a single piedmont lobe in AD 1860-1870 according to Evans et al (1999).…”
Section: Glacial Forelands and Location Of Test Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contemporary shrinkage of the cryosphere is resulting in the recession of glaciers and the melting of permafrost on a global scale (Huber et al 2005), but has also led to a collaborative international effort to gather information on the contemporary behaviour of glaciers and rock glaciers (WGMS 2016;GAPHAZ 2017). This is accompanied by developments and discussions on dating (Hubbard & Glasser 2005), among which lichenometry and Schmidt hammer are very popular, but there are still different approaches to these methods (Winkler & Shakesby 1995;Evans et al 1999;Bradwell 2009;Dąbski 2007Dąbski , 2009Dąbski , 2014, which justifies our research in Kaunertal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%