1980
DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(80)90009-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three methods for the determination of available lysine in barley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Replacing direct counting of protozoa cells by indirect AEP determination did not result in any marked improvement of the correlation of RNV with BV or NPU, but the modification avoids tedious cell counting in a haemocytometer and allows analyses to be done at any time. It may be usefully applied in the T. pyriformis assay of amino acid availability (Stott & Smith, 1966;Shorrock, 1976;El-Sherbiny, Draper & Topps, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replacing direct counting of protozoa cells by indirect AEP determination did not result in any marked improvement of the correlation of RNV with BV or NPU, but the modification avoids tedious cell counting in a haemocytometer and allows analyses to be done at any time. It may be usefully applied in the T. pyriformis assay of amino acid availability (Stott & Smith, 1966;Shorrock, 1976;El-Sherbiny, Draper & Topps, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%