2018 11th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/bmeicon.2018.8609996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three preprocessing techniques for kidney stone segmentation in CT scan images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, because of the nature of CT scanning in kidney stone case, the location of kidney stone is enclosed inside of bony skeleton and bed-mat is existed at the behind of bony skeleton and stone. Estimation two coordinate thresholding values have been applied for locationbased thresholding algorithm [30]. As a result of the pre-processing, bony skeleton and some bone fragments are removed from the image.…”
Section: Implementation Detailmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, because of the nature of CT scanning in kidney stone case, the location of kidney stone is enclosed inside of bony skeleton and bed-mat is existed at the behind of bony skeleton and stone. Estimation two coordinate thresholding values have been applied for locationbased thresholding algorithm [30]. As a result of the pre-processing, bony skeleton and some bone fragments are removed from the image.…”
Section: Implementation Detailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For performance evaluation, sensitivity was used in this study for a comparison of proposed algorithm. In [31], it is calculated using TP and FN rate as shown below:…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%