2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three single layer anastomotic techniques in the colon of the rat

Abstract: The Gambee technique had significantly better biomechanical and histological results compare to the other two anastomotic techniques. Adhesion density was significantly lower in the control group (p<0.001).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present review included 2 experimental studies on rat colon, comparing histologic results of fullthickness sutures with those of serosubmucosal sutures. Houdart et al 28 found no significant histologic differences, but Krasniqi et al 29 found better histologic results for full-thickness sutures with equal anastomotic strength. No comparative clinical studies were found on the configuration of the bite.…”
Section: Configuration Of the Bitementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The present review included 2 experimental studies on rat colon, comparing histologic results of fullthickness sutures with those of serosubmucosal sutures. Houdart et al 28 found no significant histologic differences, but Krasniqi et al 29 found better histologic results for full-thickness sutures with equal anastomotic strength. No comparative clinical studies were found on the configuration of the bite.…”
Section: Configuration Of the Bitementioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is observed that around the 4 th day after surgery its rate get the lowest point, with a tendency for growing from the 7 th day after surgery 6,10,28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large intestine, due to its content and its peculiar conditions -such as the presence of large amounts of bacteria in its lumen and the absence of peritoneal lining in some segments -is more prone to anastomotic dehiscence compared to stomach and small intestine [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anastomosis quality was assessed by the following parameters: endoluminal and extraluminal macroscopic appearance of the anastomotic line, perianastomotic adhesion density, the bursting pressure of the anastomoses, and histological changes during the healing phases. There have been numerous clinical and experimental studies on surgical techniques and the healing process of intestinal anastomosis [13, 10]. Traditionally, surgical sutures have been used to perform manual intestinal anastomoses which are mainly made by staplers, and training of surgeons in manual anastomosing is still very much needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%