2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2009.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of two methods for the segmentation of masses in the digital mammograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dubey et. al., [11] performed a performance comparison of level set and watershed segmentation methods on mass segmentation. Jun et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dubey et. al., [11] performed a performance comparison of level set and watershed segmentation methods on mass segmentation. Jun et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] The author here compared two distinct semi automated methods named level set and marker controlled watershed methods which works to achieve accuracy and fast segmentation of tumor detected. [2] The author presented here an adaptive contrast enhancement method for breast skin-air interface detection which is responsible for combining use of method named adaptive histogram equalization on tiny portion or interested area that are containing operators like actual edge and edge detection. [3] The author provided an easy and simplest approach for detecting tissues containing cancers in mammogram.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watershed is an extent in which the rain or ice or melting snow converges in a single point in an area of land. Watershed segmentation gets its name from the approach in which the algorithm segments regions into watershed line and volume of catchment basins [14]. Image is considered as a landscape with holes.…”
Section: Watershed Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%