2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19154-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A composite index for assessment of agricultural sustainability: the case of Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ASI is based on three -subindices (environment, economic, social), which, in turn, are divided into ten components (Water Quality, Air Quality, Soil Quality, Biodiversity, Land Use, Food Production, Organic Farming, Value Added, Labor and Knowledge, and Nutrition and Health) consisting of a large number of indicators [44]. In terms of composite indices, distinctions can be observed, with certain indices designed for specific regional scopes [38], particular states [39,40], or spanning multiple nations [81][82][83][84]88] To achieve the objectives outlined in our study, we constructed Agricultural Sustainability Indices (ASIs) for a cohort of 108 countries. This selection aligns with the constraints imposed by available statistical databases, recognizing the unavailability of comprehensive data for certain indicators across a set of countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ASI is based on three -subindices (environment, economic, social), which, in turn, are divided into ten components (Water Quality, Air Quality, Soil Quality, Biodiversity, Land Use, Food Production, Organic Farming, Value Added, Labor and Knowledge, and Nutrition and Health) consisting of a large number of indicators [44]. In terms of composite indices, distinctions can be observed, with certain indices designed for specific regional scopes [38], particular states [39,40], or spanning multiple nations [81][82][83][84]88] To achieve the objectives outlined in our study, we constructed Agricultural Sustainability Indices (ASIs) for a cohort of 108 countries. This selection aligns with the constraints imposed by available statistical databases, recognizing the unavailability of comprehensive data for certain indicators across a set of countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction of composite indices allows researchers to select the indicators used to formulate the index and its scope. Thus, several composite indices are available for the evaluation of various components of agricultural sustainability [34][35][36][37]-these can be computed at various levels, ranging from a regional perspective of a country [38] to assessments at the national level (country level) [39,40], and even for multiple nations [41]. Xin et al [41] developed a sustainable agriculture matrix, quantifying 18 indicators related to the three dimensions of sustainable agriculture, encompassing various groups of countries classified according to different criteria, such as income and geography.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, the explained variable is the comprehensive index of efficient and sustainable agriculture (ESA), which is solved by entropy method. In this research, a set of evaluation index system of county-level efficient and sustainable agriculture is constructed, which includes 3 dimensions and 10 first-level indexes, by referring to previous research results 17 , 18 and considering the availability and continuity of data, see Table 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saaty, 1987 [24] Composite cyclical-performance index [25], environmental sustainability index [26], agricultural sustainability index [27] Analytic network process (ANP)…”
Section: Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%