2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive assessment indicator of the water-energy-food nexus system based on the material consumption relationship

Lingang Hao,
Jingjie Yu,
Ping Wang
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the coupling coordination of the WEFE system in Dalad Banner and its townships is relatively poor, its development level needs to be improved, and there are some differences in the development of spatial coordination degree among the townships. In a study on the Amu Darya River (ADR) Basin, the three countries within the basin (Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan) also showed differences in coordination due to spatial factors [49]. In studies on coupled coordination in the Yangtze River Basin, the spatio-temporal pattern of WEFE coupling coordination degree among provinces in the Yangtze River Basin Economic Belt also showed significant differences [50,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the coupling coordination of the WEFE system in Dalad Banner and its townships is relatively poor, its development level needs to be improved, and there are some differences in the development of spatial coordination degree among the townships. In a study on the Amu Darya River (ADR) Basin, the three countries within the basin (Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan) also showed differences in coordination due to spatial factors [49]. In studies on coupled coordination in the Yangtze River Basin, the spatio-temporal pattern of WEFE coupling coordination degree among provinces in the Yangtze River Basin Economic Belt also showed significant differences [50,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%