2015
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00975.2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive assessment of genioglossus electromyographic activity in healthy adults

Abstract: Vranish JR, Bailey EF. A comprehensive assessment of genioglossus electromyographic activity in healthy adults. J Neurophysiol 113: 2692-2699, 2015. First published February 18, 2015 doi:10.1152/jn.00975.2014 is an extrinsic muscle of the human tongue that plays a critical role in preserving airway patency. In the last quarter century, Ͼ50 studies have reported on respiratory-related GG electromyographic (EMG) activity in human subjects. Remarkably, of the studies performed, none have duplicated subject body … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We show here that the magnitude of GG EMG in the loudness ramp approximated that for FDI during finger abduction (Figure 1). Second, the magnitude of whole muscle EMG attained in the maximum loudness task is comparable to the magnitude of EMG attained in the maximum force task (range 0.6-1.0mV), and falls within the range of forces reported for GG during tongue protrusion (range 0.5-1.5mV) (Vranish and Bailey 2015). On this basis, the ramp loudness task appears to offer a suitable framework within which to assess tongue muscle activation and against which to compare muscle and motor unit activities in FDI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…We show here that the magnitude of GG EMG in the loudness ramp approximated that for FDI during finger abduction (Figure 1). Second, the magnitude of whole muscle EMG attained in the maximum loudness task is comparable to the magnitude of EMG attained in the maximum force task (range 0.6-1.0mV), and falls within the range of forces reported for GG during tongue protrusion (range 0.5-1.5mV) (Vranish and Bailey 2015). On this basis, the ramp loudness task appears to offer a suitable framework within which to assess tongue muscle activation and against which to compare muscle and motor unit activities in FDI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This has been recently confirmed in healthy humans (576), but was not observed in rats (315). The magnitude of the total, or only the respiratory-modulated component, of lingual muscle activity in awake healthy humans, rats, and cats depends on the head position, being increased with ventral flexion or when the animal assumes a curled position (52, 341, 370, 475).…”
Section: Upper Airway Muscles and Their Activity Patternsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In studies in humans, it is common to scale the integrated EMG activity recorded during sleep and wakefulness relative to the amount of activity generated by the same subject during maximal voluntary activation (e.g., 345). This approach reveals that the total magnitude of combined tonic and respiratory-phasic baseline activity in upper airway muscles recorded during quiet wakefulness from healthy human subjects is very low (e.g., 67,246,278,280,455,541,576,601). In different studies and subjects, it ranged between 1% and 11% of the peak voluntarily generated activity (e.g., 247,346,510,541,576).…”
Section: Upper Airway Muscles and Their Activity Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations