2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.118357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive comparison of Two-Fluid Model, Discrete Element Method and experiments for the simulation of single- and multiple-spout fluidized beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these two coupling methods, Yu's research group tended to insist that the first coupling relationship be able to more reasonably reflect the true bidirectional strong coupling relationship between particles and fluid [9,11,12]. In recent two years, most CFD-DEM simulations [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] published in the renowned journal, Chem. Eng.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these two coupling methods, Yu's research group tended to insist that the first coupling relationship be able to more reasonably reflect the true bidirectional strong coupling relationship between particles and fluid [9,11,12]. In recent two years, most CFD-DEM simulations [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] published in the renowned journal, Chem. Eng.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have examined the characteristics of flow regimes of spout-fluidized beds [2,11,12]. The hydrodynamic characteristics of various flow regimes within a spout-fluidized bed were investigated by Link et al [13] through a combination of experimental and modeling approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%