A Comprehensive Review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods: Advancements, Applications, and Future Directions

Abstract

This research paper presents a comprehensive review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods, encompassing their advancements, applications, and future directions. The study begins with an introduction emphasizing the significance of MCDM in complex decision-making scenarios. Through a systematic literature review, recent developments in MCDM techniques are examined, including multi-objective methods, fuzzy-based approaches, data-driven models, and hybrid methodologies. The strengths and limitations of each method are critically analyzed. Furthermore, the paper investigates the diverse applications of MCDM in domains such as business, engineering, environment, healthcare, and public policy, highlighting the practical implications through real-world case studies. The study then identifies emerging trends and challenges in MCDM research, discussing the integration of MCDM with emerging technologies, enhancing robustness and adaptability, addressing uncertainty, and identifying unexplored domains for potential application. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for decision-makers and researchers, providing insights into the advancements, applications, and future directions of MCDM methods.

Optimizing Priority Sequencing Rules in Parallel Machine Scheduling: An Evaluation and Selection Approach using Hybrid MCDM Techniques

“…The MARCOS technique was founded on the analysis of the interrelationships between alternatives and reference values, namely ideal and anti-ideal alternatives [12][13][14][15]. The decisionmaking process in this method primarily relies on the concept of utility function.…”

An Expert-Opinion-Based Evaluation Framework for Sustainable Technology-Enhanced Learning Using Z-Numbers and Fuzzy Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights

“…This arises due to the existence of real-world situations that defy clear definition, making it arduous to establish crisp set boundaries [62,63]. Consequently, evaluations are expressed as linguistic values, tailored to align with human cognition [64,65]. To utilize these values effectively, a fuzzy number membership function is formulated to assign fuzzy numbers to specific linguistic values [66].…”

Evaluation of management practices in rice–wheat cropping system using multicriteria decision-making methods in conservation agriculture

“…The goal of the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique is to help in choosing the best option or options from a range of options 5 . This approach is commonly employed in optimizing the performance of diverse organizations, such as those operating in the industrial, management, and administrative domains, both within the public and private sectors 6 – 9 . The deliberate selection of MCDM methods, particularly the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), demonstrates a conscious decision to address the intricacies involved in agricultural decision-making 10 , 11 .…”