2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive study of the effect of GIS data on hydrology and non-point source pollution modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the NCEP-CFSR data performed poorly in both basins, regardless of size and flow characteristics, while the APHRODITE precipitation resulted in the best performance for both basins. We also note that differences in sub-basin and/or HRU delineations, while not investigated in this study, typically do not impact SWAT streamflow and other hydrologic outputs as discussed in a previous review of SWAT literature [48] and reported in several subsequent SWAT applications [92][93][94][95].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For instance, the NCEP-CFSR data performed poorly in both basins, regardless of size and flow characteristics, while the APHRODITE precipitation resulted in the best performance for both basins. We also note that differences in sub-basin and/or HRU delineations, while not investigated in this study, typically do not impact SWAT streamflow and other hydrologic outputs as discussed in a previous review of SWAT literature [48] and reported in several subsequent SWAT applications [92][93][94][95].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Eutrophication, in terms of algae blooms, has increased eightfold in the TGRA since 1990, and a particular emphasis has been placed on NPS-P. In our previous studies (Gong et al, 2011;Shen et al, 2012Shen et al, , 2013, the upstream areas of the Wuxi station (labeled as AP-1 in this research) have served as a study area. For the purpose of comparison, both of the upstream areas of AP-1 and the watershed outlet (labeled as AP-2) were selected as the study area (Fig.…”
Section: Study Watershed Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous studies (Shen et al, 2012(Shen et al, , 2013(Shen et al, , 2008(Shen et al, , 2010), the SWAT model was applied in the Daning River watershed to quantify the pollutant loads released from each subwatershed. In this research, the flow and P yields were obtained from our constructed SWAT model.…”
Section: The Targeting Of Upstream Pmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations