2014
DOI: 10.5120/14874-3252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Classification of Dynamic Urdu Copula Verb

Abstract: In this paper, a lexical functional grammar for an automatic classification of Urdu copula verb hO (be/become) is presented according to linguistic theories. A test suite of sentences containing almost all different conjugation forms of copula verb is extracted from a raw corpus. It is tried to keep only the cases of copular construction because the copula verb hO is very much dynamic in nature of function. The respective syntactic and functional structures of different cases of copular construction are presen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The root form of another copula verb ban 'become' (Abbas and Raza, 2014;Raza, 2011) is presented in 19(c). The subjunctive form of copula verb rahEN 'remain' (Abbas and Raza, 2014;Raza, 2011) is annotated in 19(d). The copula verb with present and the past tense hEN/tHE 'are/were' is annotated in 19(e).…”
Section: Copula Verbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root form of another copula verb ban 'become' (Abbas and Raza, 2014;Raza, 2011) is presented in 19(c). The subjunctive form of copula verb rahEN 'remain' (Abbas and Raza, 2014;Raza, 2011) is annotated in 19(d). The copula verb with present and the past tense hEN/tHE 'are/were' is annotated in 19(e).…”
Section: Copula Verbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second level contains eleven subcategories of V to represent different morphological or functional forms e.g. V.COP (V as a copula verb (Abbas and Raza 2014)), V.IMPERF (V has an imperfective form (Butt and Ramchand 2001; Butt and Rizvi 2010)), V.INF (V has an infinitive form Butt (1993); Abbas and Nabi Khan (2009); Abbas et al (2015)), etc. The third level contains further twenty-five subcategories to represent the morphological information in depth e.g.…”
Section: Preliminary Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end, as mentioned in Section I that the linguistic information like the Urdu POS [25], morphological information [8,9,10], Urdu Ezafe [7], verb morphological forms [2,24], etc., can improve the prediction results. The enrichment of linguistic information is possible in the extended PST version of the QASKU model because the resources needed are in pipeline.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%