1992
DOI: 10.1016/0049-3848(92)90190-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computerised system of screening for deep venous thrombosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly the values calculated for V~ and V o in the non-occluded case (model V~ = 2.49%, model V o = 46.5 ml 100 m1-1 min -1) were within the normal limits expected for a clot-free patient and agree well with the mean values obtained from clinical studies (mean V~ = 3.05%, mean V o = 51 ml 100 ml-1 min-1 ) over 413 patients (LAVERICK et al, 1992;CROAL et al, 1993;MCNALLY et al, 1993b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…More importantly the values calculated for V~ and V o in the non-occluded case (model V~ = 2.49%, model V o = 46.5 ml 100 m1-1 min -1) were within the normal limits expected for a clot-free patient and agree well with the mean values obtained from clinical studies (mean V~ = 3.05%, mean V o = 51 ml 100 ml-1 min-1 ) over 413 patients (LAVERICK et al, 1992;CROAL et al, 1993;MCNALLY et al, 1993b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In addition, the invasive procedure and dye-compound can produce local venospasm (MCLACHAN et al, 1979), so the venography does not always provide a completely accurate picture of the clot and vessel geometry. Despite these reservations with regard to the accuracy of the venography in defining clot sizes, the broad agreement between the results of the numerical simulation and clinical studies comparing SGP and venography is encouraging (LAVERICK et al, 1992;CROAL et al, 1993;MCNALLY et al, 1993b). The numerical simulations predict that the SGP technique should be able to detect non-occlusive clots in the large proximal veins, as well as complete occlusions of calf veins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reported sensitiv ity and specificity range from 95-100% and 80-100%, respectively (Table 2). Like IPG, SGP is sensitive and specific in proximal vein thrombosis, but lacks accuracy in calf vein thrombosis [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67].…”
Section: Strain-gauge Plethysmography (Sgp)mentioning
confidence: 99%