A conceptual framework for hybrid building projects

Adeyeye, Kemi; Bouchlaghem, Dino; Pasquire, Christine

doi:10.1108/02632771011042464

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The importance of 'adaptable buildings' has been frequently discussed in literature, particularly with regard to various facets of building adaptations, such as 'technical and functional performance of adaptable buildings' (Gann and Barlow, 1996;Slaughter, 2001;Kendall, 2003;Larssen and Bjorbery, 2004), 'stakeholders' motivation and benefits' (Arge, 2005;Kalita, 2006), 'regulations and policies' (Kincaid, 2002;Adeyeye, Bouchlaghem and Pasquire, 2010;Ren, Shih, and McKercher, 2014), 'sustainability' (Kincaid, 2000, Thomsen andFlier, 2009) and 'risk' (Remoy and Voordt, 2007). Adaptable buildings are defined as 'dynamic systems that carry the capacity to accommodate a set of evolving demands regarding space, function, and components ' (Adaptable Futures, 2012).…”

Section: Role Of Adaptable Buildingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptable buildings for sustainable built environment

Manewa

Siriwardena²,

Ross

et al. 2016

Built Environment Project and Asset Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adaptable buildings for sustainable built environment http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/3672/ Article LJMU has developed LJMU Research Online for users to access the research output of the University more effectively. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LJMU Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain.The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. LJMU Research Online Adaptable buildings for sustainable built environment PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the ability of 'adaptable buildings' to respond to future potential built environment changes in sustainable way.Design/methodology/approach A detailed literature review and a case study were undertaken to identify the life cycle changes of typical buildings over a period of more than 100 years. Twelve (12) semistructured interviews were conducted among construction industry professionals to identify how adaptable buildings enhance sustainability within the built environment. Case study data were analysed through a Morphological Analysis, and the interview data were analysed through discourse analysis. Originality/valueThis paper reports a longitudinal study spanning over 100 years, exploring the extent of building adaptation within a selected cluster of Liverpool city centre, UK. The study further confirms the need to incorporate adaptability as a key criterion when designing buildings. The increased rate at which 'change of use' has occurred further reinforces the need. Lack of track records on designing for reuse makes this an interesting challenge for the construction industry, hence likely to have significant implications for policy / strategy formulation.

show abstract

Section: Role Of Adaptable Buildingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptable buildings for sustainable built environment

Manewa

Siriwardena²,

Ross

et al. 2016

Built Environment Project and Asset Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The session lasted two hours ten minutes. The validation of the framework was done on the criteria of coverage, practicability, usefulness and correctness recommended by Liu (2000), Adeyeye et al (2010) for evaluation of a framework. Table V shows the description and evaluation of the proposed framework.…”

Section: Research Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The few number of participants was because of the presence of few FM benchmarking experts in the country. The framework was validated on the criteria of coverage, practicability, usefulness and correctness recommended by Liu (2000), Adeyeye et al (2010), Delago and Aspinal for evaluation of a framework. The aim of validating the framework was to ascertain the accuracy and extent at which it describes and guides any facility manager in the conduct of best practice FM benchmarking practice.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-sector framework for benchmarking in facilities management

Adewunmi

Iyagba

Omirin

2017

BIJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Benchmarking in FM practice although understood and applied globally, little is known about the practice in Nigeria. The purpose of this paper is to develop a framework to guide the use of benchmarking. Design/methodology/approach The research adopts a cross-sectional survey design. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires on FM organizations in Lagos metropolis, Abuja and Port Harcourt. The results of the survey were supplemented with interviews with FM unit heads in the study areas. The framework was validated using a focus group discussion with ten FM industry experts. Findings A framework which serves as a guide for the use of best practice benchmarking was developed. It showed that there is a relationship between best practice benchmarking and location. Research limitations/implications The evaluation of the framework was limited by the number of participants involved and being that it has not been put to use. Originality/value This study develops a multi-sector framework to guide the use of best practice benchmarking in facilities management (FM). The framework explains the relationship between organizational characteristics and best practice benchmarking. In addition, there are limited empirical benchmarking frameworks in FM literature.

show abstract

Section: Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The increasing focus on the environmental performance of designs now extends to such vital aspects as requirements for adaptability [90,91]. Buildings often now require refurbishment, including bringing any upgrades to say the aesthetic and functional performance of a building [90]. The buildings may also come under the need for rehabilitation or some modernisation sometimes with some extension work or indeed any retrofit.…”

Section: Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Front End Projects Benefits Realisation from a Requirements Management Perspective—A Systematic Literature Review

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The recent notable emergence of a body of research in requirements management on one hand and benefits realisation has contributed to addressing a growing need for improved performance in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) projects. However, front end design (FED) as one of the vital processes in the project life cycle and delivery has attracted limited research to date within this understanding. This paper aims to map current evidence on requirements management in facilitating benefits realisation from an FED perspective. This is to bring about an updated and unified position on requirements management for its impact on design decision making. A systematic review of the literature covering the last ten years (2008–2018) aims first to build understanding and support identification of these emergent conceptual positions and secondly underscore essential requirements and their categorisations that impact on design discourse in FED. One hundred sixty-one peer-reviewed journal papers in the areas of benefits realisation and/or requirements management and/or FED based are identified on a pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty-six requirements are identified as important in influencing use case changes important in design decision making broadly grouped into nine major categories. Following analysis, this research finds little evidence supporting an integrated requirements management practice and understanding to support design decision making. The research further finds bias in current research discourse towards four requirements categories (technical, economics, governance and environment); and 14 requirements, dominated by three strategic values, collaboration and project governance, with over 80% share of literature. The least 14 requirements such as “flow of spaces, social status/aspiration, mobility and integrated design” among others only account for less than 10% of literature. The authors argue for new research to bridge this gap, highlight the essential role of requirements management and broaden understanding to improve benefits realisation, particularly for FED processes.

show abstract

A conceptual framework for hybrid building projects

Cited by 4 publications

References 21 publications

Adaptable buildings for sustainable built environment

Adaptable buildings for sustainable built environment

Multi-sector framework for benchmarking in facilities management

Front End Projects Benefits Realisation from a Requirements Management Perspective—A Systematic Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About