A Conceptual Framework of Data Readiness: The Contextual Intersection of Quality, Availability, Interoperability, and Provenance

Abstract

Background Data readiness is a concept often used when referring to health information technology applications in the informatics disciplines, but it is not clearly defined in the literature. To avoid misinterpretations in research and implementation, a formal definition should be developed. Objectives The objective of this research is to provide a conceptual definition and framework for the term data readiness that can be used to guide research and development related to data-based applications in health care. Methods PubMed, the National Institutes of Health RePORTER, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Duke University Library databases for business and information sciences were queried for formal mentions of the term “data readiness.” Manuscripts found in the search were reviewed, and relevant information was extracted, evaluated, and assimilated into a framework for data readiness. Results Of the 264 manuscripts found in the database searches, 20 were included in the final synthesis to define data readiness. In these 20 manuscripts, the term data readiness was revealed to encompass the constructs of data quality, data availability, interoperability, and data provenance. Discussion Based upon our review of the literature, we define data readiness as the application-specific intersection of data quality, data availability, interoperability, and data provenance. While these concepts are not new, the combination of these factors in a novel data readiness model may help guide future informatics research and implementation science. Conclusion This analysis provides a definition to guide research and development related to data-based applications in health care. Future work should be done to validate this definition, and to apply the components of data readiness to real-world applications so that specific metrics may be developed and disseminated.

Enhancing the use of EHR systems for pragmatic embedded research: lessons from the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory

“…While it might seem as if the needle has not moved on any of these issues, it is possible that studies are evolving in their data needs (eg, more complex interventions, more targeted and personalized interventions integrated with EHR systems) and that we are EHR-enabled to answer more sophisticated research questions. To better assess the improvement of these PCT facilitators at a national level, the Collaboratory Coordinating Center explores metrics for interoperability of EHRs and data “readiness” 65 , 66 for pragmatic research. A number of national developments indicated that standardization of EHRs and data are progressing.…”

Industrial data sharing and data readiness: a law and economics perspective

“…Andreoli-Versbach and Mueller-Langer (2014) provide evidence that, once the cost of data production and preparation are sunk due to the publication of an empirical article in a scientific journal with a mandatory data-disclosure policy, the likelihood of voluntary data sharing -via public data archives -increases.8 In contrast, in the medical field, the term 'data readiness' refers to the idea that data is directly usable for a specific application(Douthit et al, 2021).…”