2010
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.1635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conservative strategy to protect P2P file sharing systems from pollution attacks

Abstract: SUMMARYDespite being currently one of the main Internet applications, P2P file sharing has been hampered by content pollution attacks. To tackle this problem, we introduce a novel pollution control strategy that consists in adjusting the rate in which content is disseminated, according to content version reputation. The proposed strategy is modeled and evaluated using simplifying assumptions. Then, inspired by classic distributed designs, we propose a pollution control mechanism that implements such a strategy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides using a general reputation model, the mechanism gathers extra inherent file-related information for peers to identify the potential pollution without completely downloading the requested content. Barcellos et al [25] developed a reputation-based pollution control strategy in which the dissemination rate of a content is limited according to the reputation of the version. In this way, the polluted content is eliminated before a peer vote on the version negatively.…”
Section: File Pollution Studies and Counteractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides using a general reputation model, the mechanism gathers extra inherent file-related information for peers to identify the potential pollution without completely downloading the requested content. Barcellos et al [25] developed a reputation-based pollution control strategy in which the dissemination rate of a content is limited according to the reputation of the version. In this way, the polluted content is eliminated before a peer vote on the version negatively.…”
Section: File Pollution Studies and Counteractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%