2012
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1207943110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conserved molecular basis for photoperiod adaptation in two temperate legumes

Abstract: Legumes were among the first plant species to be domesticated, and accompanied cereals in expansion of agriculture from the Fertile Crescent into diverse environments across the Mediterranean basin, Europe, Central Asia, and the Indian subcontinent. Although several recent studies have outlined the molecular basis for domestication and eco-geographic adaptation in the two main cereals from this region, wheat and barley, similar questions remain largely unexplored in their legume counterparts. Here we identify … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
204
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
204
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We subsequently identified a third recessive mutant allele, ppd-3, from EMS mutagenesis of the pea line NGB5839 (Hecht et al, 2007), which has been widely used as a reference wild-type line. Both of these parental lines carry the same hr mutation (Weller et al, 2012). Figure 1 and Supplemental Figure S1 confirm that in contrast to the photoperiod-responsive wild type (P , 0.001), the ppd-3 allele confers early flowering (P , 0.001) regardless of photoperiod, equivalent to ppd-1 and ppd-2 (Taylor and Murfet, 1996) and to sn and dne mutants (Murfet, 1971;King and Murfet, 1985;Liew et al, 2009Liew et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Ppd Contributes To Photoperiodic Floweringsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We subsequently identified a third recessive mutant allele, ppd-3, from EMS mutagenesis of the pea line NGB5839 (Hecht et al, 2007), which has been widely used as a reference wild-type line. Both of these parental lines carry the same hr mutation (Weller et al, 2012). Figure 1 and Supplemental Figure S1 confirm that in contrast to the photoperiod-responsive wild type (P , 0.001), the ppd-3 allele confers early flowering (P , 0.001) regardless of photoperiod, equivalent to ppd-1 and ppd-2 (Taylor and Murfet, 1996) and to sn and dne mutants (Murfet, 1971;King and Murfet, 1985;Liew et al, 2009Liew et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Ppd Contributes To Photoperiodic Floweringsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…In the closely syntenic region of Medicago truncatula chromosome 1, these markers correspond to gene models Medtr1g009200 and Medtr1g018840 and define an interval of around 4.3 Mb containing ;900 genes. Within this region we identified several genes potentially related to flowering time control, including two miR156 genes, the CONSTANS-like gene COLb (Wong et al, 2014), and a gene with strong similarity to the previously described HR/ELF3 gene (Weller et al, 2012), which we termed ELF3b. In view of the circadian clockrelated role of PPD, we considered only the last two sequences as plausible candidates.…”
Section: Ppd Is the Second Of Two Duplicate Elf3 Genes In Peamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In legumes such as Pisum sativum (pea), Glycine max (Soybean) and Medicago truncatula (Medicago), studies on flowering gene orthologues have discovered several genes with a conserved role in the regulation of flowering time in response to photoperiod. However, the function of these CO homologues in photoperiod response is still not clear (Hecht et al, 2005;Hecht et al, 2007;Jiang et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2011;Watanabe et al, 2011;Weller et al, 2012;Wong et al, 2014).…”
Section: Timing Of Cab Expression (Cct)mentioning
confidence: 99%