2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cost-effective approach to handle measurement and verification uncertainties of energy savings

Abstract: Measurement and verification (M&V) function has been adopted in many energy efficiency (EE) programmes to quantify energy savings, identify new energy efficiency opportunities, improve EE programme design, and reduce EE programme performance risks. Budgetary constraints in EE programmes necessitate careful planning to minimise M&V cost whilst maintaining M&V accuracy. For this purpose, this study presents an M&V cost minimisation model to handle M&V sampling and modelling uncertainties costeffectively. In the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lower risk of dispute with the client, lower risk of needing to deliver shortfall compensation, etc.). On the other hand, a higher guarantee [11,32,39,40]. makes the ESCO more competitive and more likely to win the project bidding process.…”
Section: Conventional Energy Performance Contracting Risk Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lower risk of dispute with the client, lower risk of needing to deliver shortfall compensation, etc.). On the other hand, a higher guarantee [11,32,39,40]. makes the ESCO more competitive and more likely to win the project bidding process.…”
Section: Conventional Energy Performance Contracting Risk Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement uncertainty can only be considered negligible when using high-calibre metering devices. Power meters commonly have measurement errors of less than one per cent [10]. Equation (1) below, found in the ASHRAE guideline [24], represents an equation that can be applied to multiple meters to determine the relative measurement error percentage.…”
Section: Measurement Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most directly relevant work was done by Ye and his co-authors [18][19][20]37]. Improvements on Ye et al's method were suggested by Carstens et al [16,38], and an extension considering modelling uncertainty was done by Olinga [39]. Ye et al's method reduces sample sizes in two ways.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%