2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical modeling and evaluation of geothermal extraction in the enhanced geothermal system based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…while the evaluation index weight is determined by the analytic hierarchy process. The analytic hierarchy process is a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions, based on mathematics and psychology (Guo et al 2020;Wang and Duan 2019). It decomposes the elements related to decision-making into levels such as goals, criteria and plans and then performs qualitative and quantitative analysis on this basis (Guo et al 2016a, b;Hu et al 2018).…”
Section: Risk Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…while the evaluation index weight is determined by the analytic hierarchy process. The analytic hierarchy process is a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions, based on mathematics and psychology (Guo et al 2020;Wang and Duan 2019). It decomposes the elements related to decision-making into levels such as goals, criteria and plans and then performs qualitative and quantitative analysis on this basis (Guo et al 2016a, b;Hu et al 2018).…”
Section: Risk Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first-tiered indices include corrosion rate (U1) and residual strength (U2), while the second-tiered indices include temperature (V1), CO 2 partial pressure (V2), flow velocity (V3), corrosion depth (V4), corrosion radius (V5) and wellhead pressure (V6). Then, judgment matrices are constituted by pairwise comparison according to Saaty 1-9 scales shown in Table 4 (Guo et al 2020;Gao et al 2010). On the basis of experts' experience, corrosion tests and numerical simulation results, the judgment matrices of first-tiered index (A) and second-tiered index (B1, B2) are shown in Tables 5, 6 and 7.…”
Section: Determination Of Evaluation Index Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hot fluid is abstracted from the abstraction well; then the cold fluid is re-injected into the subsurface to form the circulation. Two main criteria need to be addressed when designing an EGS (Kaya et al, 2011;Rivera et al, 2015;Figueiredo et al, 2020): (1) temperature at the abstraction well: if the temperature decreases quickly during the operation, the lifetime of the EGS will be much restricted; (2) the pore pressure difference between wells of injection and abstraction; if the pressure difference is too large, the EGS will not be cost-effective, i.e., the cost of injection and abstraction will be too high. Therefore, these two criteria are investigated in our study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method has been well applied in many fields [15,16]; however, it is less involved in the field of mineral crushing. In this study, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system, which is based on the analytic hierarchy process, was introduced into the field of ultrafine grinding; comprehensive indicators were used to optimize the ultrafine grinding process of mineral powders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%