2016
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiw209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical evaluation of ecological indices for the comparative analysis of microbial communities based on molecular datasets

Abstract: In times of global change and intensified resource exploitation, advanced knowledge of ecophysiological processes in natural and engineered systems driven by complex microbial communities is crucial for both safeguarding environmental processes and optimising rational control of biotechnological processes. To gain such knowledge, high-throughput molecular techniques are routinely employed to investigate microbial community composition and dynamics within a wide range of natural or engineered environments. Howe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, the era of "Big Data" has spread to ecology, in particular microbial ecology. This has driven a reassessment of which diversity indices to use to summarize and analyze these data [7]. This has led to increased focus on the mathematical behaviour of different measures, since there has been an increasing recognition that ecologists (often non-experts in mathematics) are using measures of diversity without proper consideration of their behaviour and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, the era of "Big Data" has spread to ecology, in particular microbial ecology. This has driven a reassessment of which diversity indices to use to summarize and analyze these data [7]. This has led to increased focus on the mathematical behaviour of different measures, since there has been an increasing recognition that ecologists (often non-experts in mathematics) are using measures of diversity without proper consideration of their behaviour and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the indices themselves, their estimators should be selected carefully to ensure that their formulation is appropriate for the particular application. Interrogation of this point is key, particularly since non-experts often resort to dedicated statistical software or packages whose underlying and disparate estimation techniques can result in different calculations of the same quantity [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Making the right choice requires acknowledgement of the essential concepts and differences between the available approaches, because the final results might depend on the decisions researchers make to measure biodiversity. Given the plethora of metrics available, and since the incorporation of complex attributes like phylogenies increases the level of abstraction, there is an increasing awareness of the need to implement intuitively meaningful diversity measures rather than abstract indices, as the latter can be easily misused and misinterpreted (Jost, ; Leinster & Cobbold, ; Lucas et al, ; Tuomisto, ). In this regard, considerable effort has recently been dedicated to creating frameworks that unify and generalize popular indices (Chao, Chiu, et al, ; Jost, ; Tucker et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific details on the DNA extraction, sequencing, and data treatment have been described previously [32] and are presented in the Supplementary Information (Text S1). The bacterial and archaeal communities were analysed for community diversity and evenness ( 1 D and 1 E) by calculating the first-order Hill diversity numbers, which have been suggested to be the most important diversity and evenness indices [33]. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on the "Bray-Curtis" dissimilarities was used to evaluate at which point the microbial communities of TE-depleted reactors began diverging from the control.…”
Section: Microbial Community Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%