2019
DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical perspective on the concept of biocultural diversity and its emerging role in nature and heritage conservation

Abstract: 1. The continuing losses of biodiversity around the world remain problematic for nature conservation. A fundamental issue that has triggered debates in nature conservation is the relationship between human culture, heritage and history, and nature expressed as ecology or biodiversity.2. Traditionally, nature conservation has been pursued separately from aspects of cultural heritage; a situation which seems perplexing when we consider the importance of traditional management in the maintenance of biodiversity i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
105
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
105
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a productive mosaic of habitats where the harmonious interaction of people and nature sustains biodiversity and provides humans with an ecosystem that supports various livelihoods and well-being [74,75]. This bio-cultural diversity is a major source of change response capacity which is strongly linked to community resilience [76,77] and needs to be further enhanced and promoted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a productive mosaic of habitats where the harmonious interaction of people and nature sustains biodiversity and provides humans with an ecosystem that supports various livelihoods and well-being [74,75]. This bio-cultural diversity is a major source of change response capacity which is strongly linked to community resilience [76,77] and needs to be further enhanced and promoted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that recognising cultural heritage is important for current patterns of biodiversity and its conservation (e.g. Rotherham 2015;Bridgewater and Rotherham 2019;Cicinelli, Salerno, and Caneva 2018), not the least in forest ecosystems (e.g. Eriksson 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Protection of ES within integrated strategies that balance ecological and societal needs must thus recognize the climatic, economic and social context in which a socio‐ecological system operates (Boulton, Ekebom, & Gíslason, 2016; Ormerod, 2014). Despite concerns that socio‐ecological integration may compromise the effectiveness of biodiversity protection (Boon, 2012; Dudgeon, 2014), ES provision can relate positively to ecological quality (Grizzetti et al., 2019), with concepts of biocultural diversity identifying positive feedbacks between biodiversity and CES (Bridgewater & Rotherham, 2019). Management strategies can therefore legitimately seek to maximize delivery of ES bundles without compromising ecosystem quality (Bennett, Peterson, & Gordon, 2009; Gilvear et al., 2013), aligning with the ‘wise use of wetlands’ philosophy proposed by the Ramsar Convention.…”
Section: Protecting Ecosystem Service Provision Within Socio‐ecologicmentioning
confidence: 99%