1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1234-988x(199610)6:3<129::aid-mpr164>3.3.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross‐cultural Community Based Study of Dementias: Methods and Performance of the Survey Instrument, Indianapolis, U.S.A., and Ibadan, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
100
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…10 For individuals in the original baseline cohort, we tracked changes in scores over each successive screening interview and categorized the decline in scores as "poor performance" (7% with most decline), "intermediate performance" (8 to 14% decline group), and "good performance" (stable scores, improvement, or minimal decline). This resulted in 75% in the good performance group, approximately 13% in the intermediate group, and 12% in the poor performance group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 For individuals in the original baseline cohort, we tracked changes in scores over each successive screening interview and categorized the decline in scores as "poor performance" (7% with most decline), "intermediate performance" (8 to 14% decline group), and "good performance" (stable scores, improvement, or minimal decline). This resulted in 75% in the good performance group, approximately 13% in the intermediate group, and 12% in the poor performance group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-samples of the study participants were selected for clinical assessment according to established cut-off scores that were derived from discriminant function analysis. Details of these had been described (Hall et al, 1996). The clinical assessment included a structured interview with an informant, neuropsychological testing, and examination by a physician as well as laboratory and imaging studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,15,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23] In one paper, two studies were reported, and we considered these studies separately. 24 Because of considerable heterogeneity in methods (sampling and study design), population samples (age, health, socioeconomic status, geographical region and cultural background) and screening or diagnostic measures, we did not pool the data but report our findings in narrative form.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only three studies documented evidence that confirmed the reliability of the tools. 12,15,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23]30,32 Three studies did not report confidence intervals (or information necessary to calculate them) 27,29,32 and one did not report a confidence interval but provided enough information for this to be calculated. 33 One study did not document sufficient information regarding appropriate probability sampling.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation