1995
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/50a.6.m291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-sectional Validation Study of the FICSIT Common Data Base Static Balance Measures

Abstract: A balance scale was developed that appears to have acceptable reliability, validity, and discriminant ability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
207
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
207
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Sie wurde in DEGS1 um den Einbeinstand ergänzt, um den Schwierigkeitsgrad zu erhöhen und eine bessere Differenzierung zu erlangen [36]. Die in DEGS1 beschriebene Abnahme der Balancefähigkeit mit zunehmendem Alter entspricht den Ergebnissen anderer Studien [22,36,51].…”
Section: Balance-testsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sie wurde in DEGS1 um den Einbeinstand ergänzt, um den Schwierigkeitsgrad zu erhöhen und eine bessere Differenzierung zu erlangen [36]. Die in DEGS1 beschriebene Abnahme der Balancefähigkeit mit zunehmendem Alter entspricht den Ergebnissen anderer Studien [22,36,51].…”
Section: Balance-testsunclassified
“…Sie wurde in DEGS1 um den Einbeinstand ergänzt, um den Schwierigkeitsgrad zu erhöhen und eine bessere Differenzierung zu erlangen [36]. Die in DEGS1 beschriebene Abnahme der Balancefähigkeit mit zunehmendem Alter entspricht den Ergebnissen anderer Studien [22,36,51]. Geplant sind Auswertungen zum bekannten Zusammenhang zwischen Balancefähigkeit und Stürzen [23] und Mobilitätseinschränkungen [33].…”
Section: Balance-testsunclassified
“…Timed chair stands test. 36 For this test, the time needed to stand up and sit down 5 consecutive times as fast as possible was recorded. An armless chair was used, and the arms of the subject were folded across the chest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FICSIT-4 balance test. 36 This test included 4 foot positions: (1) parallel with both feet placed as close together as possible, (2) semi-tandem with the heel of 1 foot placed to the side of the first toe of the other foot, (3) tandem with 1 foot placed behind the other on a straight line, and (4) standing on 1 leg. For each position a maximum time of 10 seconds was taken.…”
Section: (18%) In Intervention Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a score was less than 3 seconds, no further attempts were made in subsequent positions. A summary score for the 4 positions was computed as proposed by Rossiter-Fornoff et al 36 For all 4 mobility tests, the best score out of 2 attempts was taken for further analyses and the mobility test scores were summarized as proposed by Guralnik et al 38 For each individual test, 1 to 4 points were given corresponding to the quartiles of the study sample distribution. If a subject was not able to perform the test, 0 points were given.…”
Section: (18%) In Intervention Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%