2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(02)00145-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cumulative sum test for a peri-stimulus time histogram using the Monte Carlo method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This computation allowed identification of periods of reduction or increase in firing probability, which should correspond to an inhibitory or an excitatory effect on the motoneuron (see Gustafsson & McCrea, 1984). To identify the onset of an effect, the cumulative sum technique (see Ellaway, 1978), coupled to the Monte Carlo method (see Ushiba et al ., 2002), was used. In fact, with this procedure the operator can set the limit of the windows in which a statistical analysis will be performed.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This computation allowed identification of periods of reduction or increase in firing probability, which should correspond to an inhibitory or an excitatory effect on the motoneuron (see Gustafsson & McCrea, 1984). To identify the onset of an effect, the cumulative sum technique (see Ellaway, 1978), coupled to the Monte Carlo method (see Ushiba et al ., 2002), was used. In fact, with this procedure the operator can set the limit of the windows in which a statistical analysis will be performed.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The response window was defined as the 500 msec period beginning at the onset of the 200 msec stimulus pulse. A unit was considered to be responsive if its control-subtracted PSTH was above (excitatory) or below (inhibitory) the 95% confidence limits derived from a cumulative sum (CUMSUM) test based on the Monte Carlo method (Ushiba et al, 2002). Inspection of the entire 118 unit data set revealed that a 500 msec window was sufficient to capture all of the 1000ϩ stimulus-evoked responses recorded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b). The confidence interval was calculated in accordance with the technique previously reported (USHIBA et al, 2002a;2003b). As a result of the CUSUM test, a significant increase was detected at 49 ms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%