2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2963500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A DC Series Arc Fault Detection Method Using Line Current and Supply Voltage

Abstract: In recent years, DC fault arc detection has been an electrical engineering research hotspot. At present, most proposed detection methods do not analyze the effects of fault arc electrical characteristics on both line current and supply voltage. Therefore, this study extensively analyzes variations of the line current and supply voltage because of DC arc faults based on the volt-ampere characteristics of DC arc faults. Then, a DC series arc fault detection method is proposed that comprehensively uses informatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To train the RNN, it is necessary to measure the difference between the true value and the estimated value of the RNN output by using the loss function. The cross-entropy function was selected as the loss function of the proposed RNN model, see (1).…”
Section: Rnn Training and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To train the RNN, it is necessary to measure the difference between the true value and the estimated value of the RNN output by using the loss function. The cross-entropy function was selected as the loss function of the proposed RNN model, see (1).…”
Section: Rnn Training and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (1), Y is the true value,Ŷ is the estimated value. N is the number of samples, M is the number of labels, y ij is the indicator variable (0 or 1),ŷ ij is the probability that sample i belongs to category j.…”
Section: Rnn Training and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Series arcs detection methods [4,52]. The method in [4] is based on the comparison of current drop estimates in successive short time intervals (50 µs) and with running average values on longer intervals (50 ms), showing a factor of 2 of difference in the indicators with and without arc; the required sampling is 200 kSa/s, thus potentially exposed to high-frequency pollution from static converters, then reduced by successive averaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Series arcs detection methods [4,52]. The method in [4] is based on the comparison of current drop estimates in successive short time intervals (50 µs) and with running average values on longer intervals (50 ms), showing a factor of 2 of difference in the indicators with and without arc; the required sampling is 200 kSa/s, thus potentially exposed to high-frequency pollution from static converters, then reduced by successive averaging. Similarly, in [53], min and max current values are run over optimized window lengths (5 to 25 ms), whose difference is an indicator of intermittence; the influence of system noise was not investigated, although the number of consecutive windows used in estimates can be used to filter out grid transients such as load steps, avoiding them being detected as arcs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%