1990
DOI: 10.1080/03155986.1990.11732125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dea Model For Measuring The Relative Eeficiency Of Highway Maintenance Patrols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One more method for addressing the problem is the DEA common-weight evaluation method. Cook, Roll, and Kazakov (1990) and Roll, Cook, and Golany (1991) firstly proposed to use common weights for efficiency evaluation in DEA in the application background of performance evaluation and ranking of highway maintenance units. Further work on DEA common-weight evaluation can be seen in Kao and Hung (2005); Zohrehbandian et al (2010);and Sun et al (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One more method for addressing the problem is the DEA common-weight evaluation method. Cook, Roll, and Kazakov (1990) and Roll, Cook, and Golany (1991) firstly proposed to use common weights for efficiency evaluation in DEA in the application background of performance evaluation and ranking of highway maintenance units. Further work on DEA common-weight evaluation can be seen in Kao and Hung (2005); Zohrehbandian et al (2010);and Sun et al (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting approach for us to obtain the ranking of units in the DEA structure is to apply the common weights to all DMUs. The use of common weights in DEA was first proposed by Cook et al [11] and Roll et al [12] to evaluate highway maintenance units. Cook et al [13,14] gave a subjective ordinal preference ranking with common weights obtained by closing the gap between the upper and lower limits of the weights while they proceed a series of bounded DEA runs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nonuniqueness of input and output weights would damage the use of cross-efficiency evaluation. To solve this problem, one solution suggested by Sexton et al [8] is to introduce a secondary goal to gain a unique set of the input and output weights among the multiple optimal solutions determined by the CCR-efficiency model (3). The most commonly used secondary goal functions were suggested by Doyle and Green [9] and are shown below:…”
Section: =1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such method is DEA super efficiency model [2] that will lead to the efficiency value of efficient DMUs to be larger than 1, which will further distinguish the efficient DMUs. Another method is DEA common-weight evaluation [3]. Unlike the traditional DEA model in which each DMU uses its own favorable weights to measure the efficiency, the DEA common-weight evaluation adopts the common set of weights to measure the efficiency of all DMUs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%