2002
DOI: 10.1080/13670050208667756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Developmental Examination of Memory Strategies in Bilingual Six, Eight and Ten Year Olds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another showed equivalent free recall for monolinguals and highly proficient bilinguals performing the task in L1 and L2 (Francis & Baca, 2014). In contrast, when children free recalled food items presented in a story context, balanced bilinguals performed better than monolinguals (Haritos, 2002). In free recall of short imperative sentences like “read the book,” bilingual children performed at an equivalent level or higher level relative to monolingual children depending on the scoring system used (Kormi-Nouri, Moniri, & Nilsson, 2003).…”
Section: Recall and Semantic Clustering In Bilingual Researchmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another showed equivalent free recall for monolinguals and highly proficient bilinguals performing the task in L1 and L2 (Francis & Baca, 2014). In contrast, when children free recalled food items presented in a story context, balanced bilinguals performed better than monolinguals (Haritos, 2002). In free recall of short imperative sentences like “read the book,” bilingual children performed at an equivalent level or higher level relative to monolingual children depending on the scoring system used (Kormi-Nouri, Moniri, & Nilsson, 2003).…”
Section: Recall and Semantic Clustering In Bilingual Researchmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Previous research suggested that monolingual performance would be equivalent to L1 but superior to L2 performance in unbalanced bilinguals when lists contained items chosen from a limited set of categories (Harris et al, 1995). With balanced bilinguals, past research results were mixed (Fernandes et al, 2007; Haritos, 2002; Harris et al, 1995).…”
Section: Free Recall Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bilinguals, a number of studies have compared overall free recall accuracy across L1 and L2 or across monolinguals and bilinguals (e.g., Fernandes et al, 2007; Francis & Baca, 2014; Francis et al, 2018; Haritos, 2002; Harris et al, 1995; and several earlier studies) but only one reported serial position effects, with results suggesting more accurate recall in L1 relative to L2 for early but not late serial positions (Yoo & Kaushanskaya, 2016). Although the weight of the evidence across studies suggests better recall in L1 relative to L2 and better recall in monolinguals relative to bilinguals, the results are inconsistent and do not allow definitive conclusions because of confounds and/or limited power.…”
Section: The Role Of Rehearsal Efficiency In Free Recall Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater contextual similarity and stronger associations for items presented in closer serial positions was attributed to the gradual context fluctuation cited in the variable context models. According to the retrieved context framework (Howard & Kahana, 1999, 2002, retrieving a studied word involves partial reinstatement of its temporal context, which in turn elicits the retrieval of other items studied in similar contexts, which are items from neighboring serial positions. With each successive item recalled, the corresponding context is reinstated, and the retrieval process is repeated.…”
Section: Retrieved Context Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Memory is non-separable component on individuals cognitive system [5]. It is a process that knowledge will be coded, reserved, and remembered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%