1941
DOI: 10.1042/bj0350920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dietary factor concerned in coprosterol formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anaerobic intestinal bacteria not capable of forming coprostanol. Investigators (6,15,16) have been unsuccessful in attempts to demonstrate coprostanol formation by organisms that will grow or form colonies on cholesterolfree agar media either aerobically or anaerobically. During their isolation of the cholesterolreducing Eubacterium, Eyssen et al (8) also found that none of the colony-forming organisms could form coprostanol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anaerobic intestinal bacteria not capable of forming coprostanol. Investigators (6,15,16) have been unsuccessful in attempts to demonstrate coprostanol formation by organisms that will grow or form colonies on cholesterolfree agar media either aerobically or anaerobically. During their isolation of the cholesterolreducing Eubacterium, Eyssen et al (8) also found that none of the colony-forming organisms could form coprostanol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PS and its metabolites mentioned above have been detected in human feces (see Section 3 below) and its biotransformation route is similar to that of cholesterol (see Figure ). Rosenheim and Webster, and Coleman and Baumann demonstrated the conversion of β‐sitosterol into ethylcoprostanol through in vivo and in vitro studies, respectively. In addition, biotransformation studies using pure culture of Eubacterium sp.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Dietary Sterols and Gut Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sf [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] It has been observed repeatedly in hypercholesterolemic rabbits that during the first 72 hours following a single tritium-cholesterol meal the specific activity of esterified serum cholesterol is greater than the free cholesterol specific activity.9 In man this was not the case; indeed the reverse was demonstrated, the free cholesterol initially having a higher specific activity than the esterified fraction. The explanation of this difference remains to be clarified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%