2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A direct comparison of experimental methods to measure dimensions of synthetic nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
159
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
159
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained on the basis that DLS measures the particles hydrodynamic diameter, which includes polymer shells and hydration layer leading to a larger particle size. 67,68 In addition, DLS is extremely sensitive to the dispersion/aggregation behavior of the particles in solution. 68 Selective accumulation and targeting of naringin in inflamed tissues and tumor cells can still be proposed.…”
Section: Mohamed Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be explained on the basis that DLS measures the particles hydrodynamic diameter, which includes polymer shells and hydration layer leading to a larger particle size. 67,68 In addition, DLS is extremely sensitive to the dispersion/aggregation behavior of the particles in solution. 68 Selective accumulation and targeting of naringin in inflamed tissues and tumor cells can still be proposed.…”
Section: Mohamed Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67,68 In addition, DLS is extremely sensitive to the dispersion/aggregation behavior of the particles in solution. 68 Selective accumulation and targeting of naringin in inflamed tissues and tumor cells can still be proposed. Consequently, an enhancement of antiulcer and antitumor activities of naringin can be expected upon micellization with PF68.…”
Section: Mohamed Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This grain size was much bigger than that of evaluated values from SEM images. This enlargement in the grain size may be due to the involution of true particle size with that of the AFM point and also on the preparation of samples for AFM [39].…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that SEM and TEM images could be used to characterize nanoparticles (Noël et a l ., ). But, Eaton et al () noted that SEM is a more useful tool for especially detection of the larger than 50 nm nanoparticles diameter. Sreekumar, Goycoolea, Moerschbacher, and Rivera‐Rodriguez () reported that the diameter of chitosan nanoparticles could be found between 200 and 2,500 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%