2015
DOI: 10.7819/rbgn.v17i56.2069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
13

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
32
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not the purpose of this study to compare DSR with CSR, as this comparison was already made by previous research, e.g. [19,32,33]. Instead, the objective here is to respond to the previously stated research question and to understand the interplay between these two methodologies/paradigms in multidisciplinary studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not the purpose of this study to compare DSR with CSR, as this comparison was already made by previous research, e.g. [19,32,33]. Instead, the objective here is to respond to the previously stated research question and to understand the interplay between these two methodologies/paradigms in multidisciplinary studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study used design-science research (Dresch et al, 2015a;Dresch, Lacerda, & Miguel, 2015b;Hevner & Chatterjee, 2010) to develop an organizational self-assessment artifact (software) to analyze the current situation of the quality management system of small businesses and propose a prioritized list of actions to improve that system. The assessment is based on ISO 9001:2015 standard requirements.…”
Section: Methodological Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the clear distinction between action research and Design Science (Dresch et al, 2015b) in terms of objective, work process, results, and type of knowledge generated, a suggestion for future studies is to use method triangulation and include action research (Sein, Henfridsson, Purao, Rossi, & Lindgren, 2011). In this case, both the researchers and the organization should participate in defining the problem, and constructing and evaluating the artifact.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O método adotado é a Revisão Bibliográfica assistemática (RBA) e sistemática (RBS), um tipo de pesquisa bibliográfica que segue um método explícito, planejado e justificável (Dresch;Lacerda;Antunes Júnior, 2015). A RBS diferenciase da revisão assistemática por apresentar maior rigor científico, "podendo alcançar melhores resultados e reduzir erros e o viés do pesquisador responsável pela investigação" (Conforto;Amaral;Silva, 2011, p. 2 (Bastos, 2014;Oliveira, 2013), quatro artigos internacionais (Kohtala, 2015;Akiwowo et al, 2014;Atwell, 2014;Niinimäki;Hassi, 2011) e cinco artigos nacionais (Carvalho;Rüthschilling, 2016;Souza;Reis, 2014;Guimarães, 2014;Neira, 2012;Cunha, 2011).…”
Section: Materiais E Métodounclassified