2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dual-benchmark based energy analysis method to evaluate control strategies for building HVAC systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In China, the total energy consumption of HVAC systems is expected to account for 65% of residential buildings by 2020 [2]. Optimal control strategies have been increasingly developed in building HVAC systems [3]. The energy consumption of building energy systems can be greatly reduced by developing effective control strategies for building HVAC systems [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, the total energy consumption of HVAC systems is expected to account for 65% of residential buildings by 2020 [2]. Optimal control strategies have been increasingly developed in building HVAC systems [3]. The energy consumption of building energy systems can be greatly reduced by developing effective control strategies for building HVAC systems [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model Predictive Control (MPC), Fuzzy Logic Control, Neuronal Network Control and Cyber-physical control [1], promised to increase the efficiency of building energy systems in order to reduce CO2 emissions and energy consumption [2]. To evaluate the developed control strategies, many researchers compare the developed control strategy with a standard control strategy such as On/Off control, PID control [3] or an ideal controller [4]. They point out the achieved savings with the newly developed control strategy in comparison to the standard one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set point temperatures utilized in the study were chosen to match the Korean government recommendations. In addition, the mechanical system was not considered to investigate changes in building loads solely using fumed silica VIPs in the building envelope, since energy consumptions in buildings have been significantly influenced by mechanical systems [47][48][49]. Contrary to office buildings, the operating schedule of the reference building were not considered in the present study due to uncertainty in occupants' schedules.…”
Section: Ies-ve Modeling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%