2014
DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s60058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A failure to confirm the effectiveness of a brief group psychoeducational program for mothers of children with high-functioning pervasive developmental disorders: a randomized controlled pilot trial

Abstract: ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of group psychoeducation to relieve the psychological distress of mothers of children with high-functioning pervasive developmental disorders (HFPDD) and to improve the behaviors of the children.MethodsSeventy-two mothers of preschool outpatients with HFPDD were randomly assigned to a four-session brief group psychoeducational program (GP). The sessions were held every second week in addition to the usual treatment (GP + treatment as usual [TA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24,44 All studies performed random group allocation, but only three studies concealed allocation. 17,18,23 Groups were similar at baseline with respect to demographic/descriptive variables (e.g. age of parents, sex, socio-economic status, working status) in all but three studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…24,44 All studies performed random group allocation, but only three studies concealed allocation. 17,18,23 Groups were similar at baseline with respect to demographic/descriptive variables (e.g. age of parents, sex, socio-economic status, working status) in all but three studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Countries of publication for RCTs included (in descending order): the USA (n=4), 17,18,20,43 Australia (n=3), 21,22,26 Hong Kong (n=2), 9,25 the UK (n=2), 24,44 the Netherlands (n=1), 42 and Japan (n=1). 23 Countries of publication for non-RCTs included (in descending order): the USA (n=5), 28,31,32,37,41 Australia (n=4), 27,29,30,36 the UK (n=2), 34,35 India (n=1), 33 Hong Kong (n=1), 38 Iran (n=1), 39 and China (n=1). 40 The methodological quality of the RCTs was (in descending order) high in nine, 9,17,18,20,22,23,25,26,42 fair in two, 21,43 and low in two (Table SII, online supporting information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations