1997
DOI: 10.1021/jp9708660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Field Dependent 2H Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Study of the Aggregation Behavior in Micellar Solutions of CTAB and SDS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the surfactants aggregate into micelles at concentrations above the CMC and the transport of the surfactants from the bulk to the subsurface is a convectiondominated process, rather than the molecular weight of free surfactant monomers, it is the size, shape, aggregation number, and even relaxation time (stability) of the micelles that dominate the transport process. CTAB's higher dynamic interfacial tension may be due to the fact that the size of the CTAB micelle is larger than that of SDS, 37 which results in slower transport of micelles to the subsurface and ultimately a lower concentration of monomers in the subsurface.…”
Section: The Dynamic Interfacial Tension With Varied Dropletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the surfactants aggregate into micelles at concentrations above the CMC and the transport of the surfactants from the bulk to the subsurface is a convectiondominated process, rather than the molecular weight of free surfactant monomers, it is the size, shape, aggregation number, and even relaxation time (stability) of the micelles that dominate the transport process. CTAB's higher dynamic interfacial tension may be due to the fact that the size of the CTAB micelle is larger than that of SDS, 37 which results in slower transport of micelles to the subsurface and ultimately a lower concentration of monomers in the subsurface.…”
Section: The Dynamic Interfacial Tension With Varied Dropletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an easy and reliable experimental determination of micellar aggregation number is of particular interest. A number of physical methods have been used for the determination of micelle aggregation number such as NMR spectroscopy [6,7], static light scattering (references in the text below), small-angle neutron scattering [8][9][10], small-angle X-ray scattering [11], fluorescence probing methods, and electron paramagnetic resonance [8,[12][13][14][15][16]. Some of them are limited to the aggregation number determination at the surfactant concentration equal to CMC which only provides aggregation number values for isolated non-interacting particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,24 In the dynamical context, 2 H serves as a more accurate relaxation probe relative to 13 C in extracting slow dynamics occurring in the nanoseconds' time scale. 39 This stems from an exclusive intramolecular relaxation interaction and a large dynamic range offered by the quadrupolar interaction of 2 H for the motional modulation. 39 Variable magnetic field 2 H spin-relaxation data (R 2 and R 1 ) for site-specific deuterium labeled (at α position) surfactant micelles when subjected to the two-step model 35,37−40 facilitates to extract of similar information as that of 13 C in a more accurate way.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 This stems from an exclusive intramolecular relaxation interaction and a large dynamic range offered by the quadrupolar interaction of 2 H for the motional modulation. 39 Variable magnetic field 2 H spin-relaxation data (R 2 and R 1 ) for site-specific deuterium labeled (at α position) surfactant micelles when subjected to the two-step model 35,37−40 facilitates to extract of similar information as that of 13 C in a more accurate way. However, if one is interested in the geometrical aspects of micelles (size and shape) in the presence of additives such as solvents, drugs, polymers, etc., as well as the function of salinity, concentration, and temperature, it is often sufficient to monitor relaxation changes (ΔR = R 2 − R 1 ) at a single magnetic field.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%