2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2017.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element procedure for radio-frequency sheath–plasma interactions based on a sheath impedance model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Stangeby [26] has proved that the Debye sheath disappears. A more generalized form of the sheath RF impedance was proposed by Myra and D'Ippolito [29] and realized in the FEM code by Kohno and Myra [30] recently. It releases the "immobile ion" assumption and both the resistive and capacitive part of the RF sheath are retained in their new model.…”
Section: Rf Sheath Bcs Under Tilted Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Stangeby [26] has proved that the Debye sheath disappears. A more generalized form of the sheath RF impedance was proposed by Myra and D'Ippolito [29] and realized in the FEM code by Kohno and Myra [30] recently. It releases the "immobile ion" assumption and both the resistive and capacitive part of the RF sheath are retained in their new model.…”
Section: Rf Sheath Bcs Under Tilted Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(14). Our previous published work 25 has verified the rfSOL solutions for various constant density cases. The main point of interest here is in understanding the interaction of the waves with the sheath boundary condition in rfSOL using the wave-sheath impedance model as exemplified in Fig.…”
Section: B Results From Rfsolmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…(A8), Re y w2 = Re y w1 , and from Eq. (A9), Im y w2 = Im y w1 or equivalentlyIn this Appendix, we prove the equivalence of Eqs (25). and(26), i.eexplicit result for y w1 is not needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations